In the matter of an application by Lawrence Kincaid for Judicial Review

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
JudgeKerr LCJ
Judgment Date2007
Neutral Citation[2007] NIQB 26
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
Year2007
Date19 April 2007
1
Neutral Citation no. [2007] NIQB 26
Ref:
KERF5807
Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down Delivered:
19/4/07
(subject to editorial corrections)*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND
QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (JUDICIAL REVIEW)
__________
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY LAWRENCE KINCAID FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW
__________
Before Kerr LCJ and Weatherup J
__________
KERR LCJ
Introduction
[1] This is an application by Lawrence Kincaid for judicial review of the avowed
failure of the Public Prosecution Service to provide reasons for the decision not to
prosecute one Trevor Dowie for shooting the applicant. The decision not to
prosecute Mr Dowie is also challenged.
[2] It is common case that in the early hours of the morning of 7 August 2005 the
applicant was shot and injured by Mr Dowie. At the time of the shooting, Mr
Kincaid was on a motor cycle outside Mr Dowie’s house and his companion,
William Anderson, was in Mr Dowie’s garden throwing garden slates at the
window of the house. It is alleged that the applicant was involved with Mr
Anderson in an attack on Mr Dowie’s home and he has been charged with
attempting to intimidate Mr Dowie and with committing criminal damage to his
property. The applicant has denied these charges and is awaiting trial.
Factual background
[3] Mr Dowie claims that as he lay in bed asleep on the morning of 7 August 2005
he was awakened by loud bangs which he believed were either petrol or pipe
bombs. On going to the window of his bedroom he saw a man astride a
motorcycle. He heard this man shout, “Finish them all” or “Finish them

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Re Loughlin (application for judicial review (Northern Ireland))
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • October 18, 2017
    ...Prosecutions, Ex p Manning [2001] QB 330; Mohit v Director of Public Prosecutions of Mauritius [2006] UKPC 20; [2006] 1 WLR 3343; In re Lawrence Kincaid [2007] NlQB 26; Sharma v Brown-Antoine [2007] 1 WLR 870; McCabe [2010] NIQB 58; and In re Mooney's Application [2014] NIQB 48 all imp......
  • In the matter of an application by Christine Forde for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • April 11, 2008
    ...person’s life. Menson v United Kingdom (2003) 37 EHRR CD 220 and In the Matter of an Application by Laurence Kincaid for Judicial Review (2007) NIQB 26 are both authorities for the proposition that there are circumstances where there is an obligation on the State to ensure there is some for......
  • MacMahon’s (Aine) Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • July 9, 2012
    ...jurisdiction by Weatherup J in Hamill’s Application [2008] NIQB 73 and Kerr LCJ in the Divisional Court decision of Re Lawrence Kincaid [2007] NIQB 26.” [99] The respondent argues that given the applicant is not seeking to challenge a decision to prosecute or not to prosecute but is, rather......
  • B's Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • December 17, 2020
    ...that a challenge to a decision to prosecute is more difficult to sustain than one not to prosecute” see Kerr LCJ at para [23] Re McDaid [2007} NIQB 26. Some of the reasons for this distinction are summarised in Re Brady [2018] NICA 20 at paras [92]-[93]. The distinction is essentially becau......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT