Re Kingston Cotton Mill Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Year | 1896 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 cases
-
Re Bristol Fund
...All E.R. Rep. 597; (1888), 13 App. Cas. 351; 58 L.J.Q.B. 44; 59 L.T. 273; 4 T.L.R. 603, applied. (9) Kingston Cotton Mill Co., Re, [1896] 1 Ch. 6; (1896), 65 L.J. Ch. 145; 73 L.T. 482; 12 T.L.R. 60, dictum of Williams J., followed. (10) Lemos v. Coutts & Co. (Cayman) Ltd., 1992–93 CILR 460,......
-
HM Revenue and Customs v Holland; Re Paycheck Services 3 Ltd
... ... of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400, Fax No: 020 7404 ... Ch. App. 104, at 118, 122 ; In re Kingston Cotton Mill Company (No 2) [1896] 1 Ch 331, at 345 to 348 ; Dovey and ... ...
-
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
...he is acting antagonistically to the directors in the sense that he is appointed by the shareholders to be a check upon them": Re Kingston Cotton Mill Company [1896] 1 Ch.6 at p.11, per Vaughan Williams J. The auditor's report must be read before the company in general meeting and must be ......
-
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
...he is acting antagonistically to the directors in the sense that he is appointed by the shareholders to be a check upon them:' In re Kingston Cotton Mill Co. [1896] 1 Ch. 6, 11, per Vaughan Williams J.” The auditor's report must be read before the company in general meeting and must be ope......
Request a trial to view additional results