Re Lai Hing Firm. Chang Hang Kiu v Piggott

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1909
Year1909
Date1909
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • You Xin v Public Prosecutor and another appeal
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 d2 Julho d2 2007
    ...v The Queen (1996) 129 DLR (4th) 500 (refd) Bok Chek Thou v Low Swee Boon [1998] 4 MLJ 342 (folld) Chang Hang Kiu v Sir Francis T Piggott [1909] AC 312 (refd) Coward v Stapleton (1953) 90 CLR 573 (refd) Emperor v Shankar Krishnaji Gavankar (1942) 44 Bom LR 439 (not folld) Hennegal v Evance ......
  • R v Frater
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 12 d5 Outubro d5 1979
    ...before arriving at his verdict.” 3 In support of this ground he referred to re Pollard [1868] L.R. 2 P.C. 106, Chang Hang Kiu v. Piggott [1909] A.C. 312Coward v. Stapleton [1953] 90 C.L.R. 573, Appuhamy v. R [1963] 1 All E.R. 762, Commissioner of Police v. Wood [1956] 1 W.A.L.R. 71, re Bach......
  • R v S
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 8 d5 Fevereiro d5 2008
    ...person charged, though it is not always necessary to formulate the charge in a series of specific allegations: Chang Hang Kiu v Piggott (1909) A.C. 312, AT P. 315. The charge having been made sufficiently explicit, the person accused must then be allowed a reasonable opportunity of being he......
  • Re Mohamed Yusoff Meera Hussain and Another (Trading as Federal Drug House)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d5 Janeiro d5 1954
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT