Re Lead Company's Workmen's Fund Society. Lowes v Governor and Company for Smelting down Lead with Pit and Sea Coal

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1904
Date1904
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Dunne and Others v Mahon and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 Octubre 2012
    ...NON-PROFIT ASSOCIATIONS 1980 43(6) MLR 626 BUCKLEY & ORS v AG & POWER (NO 2) 1950 84 ILTR 9 LEAD COMPANYS WORKMENS FUND SOCIETY, IN RE 1904 2 CH 196 GKN BOLTS & NUTS LTD (AUTOMOTIVE DIVISION) BIRMINGHAM WORKS SPORTS & SOCIAL CLUB, IN RE; LEEK v DONKERSLEY 1982 1 WLR 774 1982 2 AER 855 HARI......
  • Joyce Irene Hardy and Another v David John Hoade and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 Octubre 2017
    ...with the sums contributed on the basis that there was a resulting trust. 11.2 This approach was followed by Warrington J. in Re. Lead Company Workmen's Fund Society [1904] 2 Ch. 196 upon the dissolution of an unregistered friendly society. 11.3 O'Connor M.R. was critical of the application ......
  • Commissioner of Taxation v Lane
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 6 Noviembre 2020
    ...In re Hobourn Aero Components Limited’s Air Raid Distress Fund, Ryan v Forrest [1946] Ch 86 In re Lead Company’s Workmen’s Fund Society [1904] 2 Ch 196 In re Matheson Brothers Limited (1884) 27 Ch D 225 In re Oriental Inland Steam Co, Ex parte Scinde Railway Co (1874) LR 9 Ch App 577 In re ......
  • Hunt v McLaren
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 4 Octubre 2006
    ...of the Club can therefore be effected by amendment of the rules or by order of the court: Re Lead Co.'s Workmen's Fund Society, [1904] 2 CH 196. C Second defendant 51 For the reasons given by the First Defendant, the gift of the land made by the conveyance dated September 1, 1948 and by th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • ‘Inherent jurisdiction’ Explained
    • Ireland
    • Mondaq Ireland
    • 13 Marzo 2013
    ...Maschinenfabrik v South India Shipping Corp [1981] AC 909, p977. (2) 2012 IEHC 412. (3) [1937] IR 23. (4) (No 2) (1950) 84 ILTR 9 . (5) [1904] 2 Ch 196. (6) (1894) 10 TLR (7) (1980) MLR 626 . (8) Re Buck's Widows' Fund (No 2) [1979] 1 WLR 936. The content of this article is intended to prov......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...v Stimson (1966) 110 Sol Jo 188, ChD 134 Law v Law [1905] 1 Ch 140, 74 LJ Ch 169, 53 WR 227, CA 62 Lead Co’s Workmen’s Fund Society, Re [1904] 2 Ch 196, 73 LJ Ch 628, 52 WR 571, ChD 152 L’Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394, [1934] All ER Rep 16, 152 LT 164, DC 96 Lie v Mohile [2014] E......
  • Representative Procedures and the Future of Multi‐Party Actions
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 62-4, July 1999
    • 1 Julio 1999
    ...vSmall [1981] 2 NSWLR 525, 530.42 Harrison v(The Marquis of) Abergavenny (1887) 3 TLR 325; In re Lead Company’s Workmen’sFund Society [1904] 2 Ch 196. CPR, Part 19.2 (and before that, RSC O15 r4(2)) provides that allthose jointly entitled to a remedy must be parties to the action, but makes......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT