Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ((in Administration)) (No 4); Pearson and Others v Lehman Brothers Finance SA and other companies

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2012
Year2012
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ((in Administration)) and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 November 2012
    ...to most readers of this judgment. I need add little to my description of it in paragraphs 55 to 58 of my judgment in Pearson & ors v Lehman Brothers Finance SA [2010] EWHC 2914 (Ch) (" RASCALS"), save to say that LBF's Swiss bankruptcy process was recognised as a foreign main proceeding und......
  • The Persons Identified in Schedule 1 of the Claim Form (the “SL Claimants”) v Tesco Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 October 2019
    ... [2010] EWHC 2914 (Ch) (often, and below, referred to as ‘the Lehman Rascals case’) and re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) [2011] EWCA Civ 1544. 47 In the Lehman Rascals case, Briggs J observed at para 226 that (emphasis added): “…a trust may exist not merely between legal owner and......
  • ZI Wang v Graham Darby
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 November 2021
    ...(i) to (x). (This exposition of the relevant test is not affected by the judgment of the Court of Appeal in the same case: [2011] EWCA Civ 1544; [2012] 2 B.C.L.C. 15.) I do not set out the ten propositions here, save to observe that the guiding principle is one of objective common intentio......
  • Bethell v Papanui Properties Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 4 December 2019
    ...EWHC 2914 (Ch) at [250]–[260], on appeal Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (No 6) [2011] EWHC Civ 1554, [2012] 2 BCLC 151 at 21 Tucker, Le Poidevin and Brightwell, above n 13, at [8–048]. (emphasis added). 22 Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency, above n 5. 23 As was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT