Re Leopold Cassella & Company Gesellschaft M.B.H.
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1910 |
Year | 1910 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
- BP Plc (formerly known as BP AMOCO Plc) v Woolworths Ltd
-
Re Mothercare Ltd
...2. That the word was not adapted to distinguish the applicant's goods from the goods of others. In re Leopold Cassella & Co.ELR [1910] 2 Ch. 240 considered. 3. That the word was capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods from the goods of others, that the appeals should be allowed, and......
- F H Faulding & Company Ltd v Imperial Chemical Industries Etc Ltd
-
Faberge Incorporated v Controller of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
...a particular trader... but always from something in the word itself which makes it adapted to distinguish ( Leopold Cassella & Co. (1910) 2 Ch. 240: Application of Mothercare (1968) I.R. 7"Aphrodisia" has none of these qualities: it has a resemblance to a well known word ("Ahrodite"), it is......
Request a trial to view additional results