Re Levi & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Year | 1919 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd ((in Administration))
...contract by a liquidator are entitled to priority.” 19 He then cited Re S. Davis and & Co. Ltd. [1945] Ch 402, a case on bailment, and Re Levi & Co. Ltd. [1919] 1 Ch 416, a landlord and tenant case, in which the liquidator who retained a lease for the benefit of the liquidation was held l......
-
Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd and Others (Applicants/Claimants) v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd ((in Administration)) and Others (Respondents/Defendants)
...is due on the day it becomes payable and cannot be apportioned by time: see In re Clun’s case (1613) 10 Co Rep 127a; In re Levi & Co Ltd [1919] 1 Ch 416; Powdrill v Watson [1995] 2 AC 394 and Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455, para 20. [Reference was also made to......
-
Henry Anthony Shinners and Nicholas Myers (Joint Administrators of London Bridge Entertainment Partners LLP) v London Trocadero (2015) LLP
...or might not fall within the Lundy principle where it did apply. 110 Ms Bhaloo next took me to the case of In re Levi & Company Limited [1919] 1 Ch 416. In this case, the company was an assignee of a lease subject to usual repairing covenants, including a covenant to deliver up the premise......
-
Powdrill and Another v Watson and Another ; Talbot and Another v Cadge and Another ; Talbot and Another v Grundy and Another
...even though the obligation to deliver up only arose after the liquidator had ceased to manage the company's business. Again in In Re Levi & Company Limited [1990] Ch. 416 sums due under a covenant to deliver up in good repair at the termination of a lease of premises which had been used by ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Goldacre (Offices) Limited - When Post Administration Rent Is Payable As An Expense
...the Judge then turned to the question of the amount of the expenses claim. He considered, following the case of Re Levi & Co. Ltd [1919] 1 Ch 416 as applied to administrations, that an administrator electing to hold leasehold premises could do so only on the terms and conditions contain......