Re Little Olympian Each Ways Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 cases
  • Tjong Very
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 22 November 2010
    ...ER 534 (refd) Levene v CIR [1928] AC 217 (refd) Leyvand v Barasch The Times (23 March 2000) (folld) Little Olympian Each Ways Ltd, Re [1995] 1 WLR 560 (distd) Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd [2003] FCA 81 (folld) Ong Jane Rebecca v Pricewaterhousecoopers [2009] 2 SLR (R) 796; [2009] 2 SLR 7......
  • Texuna International Ltd v Cairn Energy Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 May 2004
    ...and not in a relevant Contracting or Regulation State. 6 The meaning of "resident" in this context was dealt with by Lindsay J., in In re Little Olympian Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 560, esp. at pp. 566–569. The inquiry is as to the location of the company's central management and control or, put anot......
  • HM Revenue and Customs v Smallwood and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 8 July 2010
    ...four cases in which (as he said) the courts had recognised the considerations to which he had just alluded. Those cases were Re Little Olympian Each Ways Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 560, Esquire Nominees Ltd v Comr of Taxation (1971) 129 CLR 177, New Zealand Forest Products Finance NV v Comr of Inland......
  • F & C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd v Barthelemy and another (No 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 28 October 2011
    ... ... matters, the main part of which provided for payment of the price to each of the Defendants for the purchase of their respective interests in the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...authorities did not concern applications for security for costs, I concur with Lindsay J's view in In re Little Olympian Each Ways Ltd[1995] 1 WLR 560… at 566 that ‘so far as concerns individuals the test applied in tax cases have without any awkwardness or consciousness of injustice been a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT