Re London and Paris Banking Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1865
Date1865
Year1865
CourtEquity

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Re Tweeds Garages Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Sparkasse Bregenz Bank AG Petitioner v Associated Capital Corporation Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 3 May 2002
    ...are implied terms of the Agreement between the Petitioner and the Company. 33 Counsel relied on the following authorities: In RE LONDON AND PARIS BANKING CORP. Vol IX Ch. 444 at page 445; and MANN V GOLDSTEIN [1968 2 All E.R. 769 at page 793 and submitted that the Petitioner should sue the......
  • Sparkasse Bregenz Bank AG Petitioner v Associated Capital Corporation Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 3 May 2002
    ...are implied terms of the Agreement between the Petitioner and the Company. 33 Counsel relied on the following authorities: In RE LONDON AND PARIS BANKING CORP. Vol IX Ch. 444 at page 445; and MANN V GOLDSTEIN [1968 2 All E.R. 769 at page 793 and submitted that the Petitioner should sue the......
  • Re Mechanised Construction Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 April 1989
    ...there could not be neglect to pay if the sum demanded was bona fide disputed. As Jessel MR stated in Re London & Paris Banking Corp (1874) LR 19 Eq 444 at p 446: Negligence is a term which is well known to the law. Negligence in paying a debt on demand, as I understand it, is omitting to pa......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...1 BCC 98,901. See also Re Brighton Club and Norfolk Hotel Co, supra, note 23, at 205; Re London and Paris Banking Corporation(1874) LR 19 Eq 444 at 447; Re K L Tractors Ltd, supra, note 2, at 509; Nickel Rim Mines Ltd v Horizon Pacific Ltd, supra, note 27, at 752. Of course, serious inconsi......