Re Mathieson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1927
Date1927

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Invest Bank PSC v Ahmad Mohammad EL-Husseini
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 May 2023
    ...issue was on the facts of that particular case. 92 Fifthly, Mr Warents places reliance on the decision of this Court in Re Mathieson [1927] 1 Ch 283, in particular at pages 295–296 in the judgment of Atkin LJ. But, as with the case of Clarkson, it seems to me that that decision is not on po......
  • Clayton v Clayton
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 26 February 2015
    ...[1994] BCC 921 [(CA)] (a decision on the definition of property in the Insolvency Act 1986, section 283(4)) Hoffmann LJ referred to In re Mathieson [ [1927] 1 Ch 283 (CA)] and said, obiter, (at p 931): I think that even at the time this was quite a remarkable decision. Lord St Leonards [ie......
  • TMSF v Merrill Lynch
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 21 June 2011
    ... ... (20) Markham v. FayUNK (1995), 884 F. Supp. 594 , referred to. (21) Masri v. Consolidated Contractors Intl. Co. SAL (No. 2) , [2009] Q.B. 450 ; [2009] 2 W.L.R. 621 ; [2008] 2 Lloyd”s Rep. 128 ; [2008] 1 C.L.C. 657 ; [2008] EWCA Civ 303 , applied. (22) Mathieson, In re , [1927] 1 Ch. 283 , considered. (23) Melville v. Inland Rev. Commrs. , [2002] 1 W.L.R. 407 ; [2001] S.T.C. 1271 ; [2001] EWCA Civ 1247 , referred to. (24) Mercedes Benz A.G. v. Leiduck , [1996] A.C. 284 ; [1995] 3 All E.R. 929 ; [1995] 3 L.R.C. 227 , referred to ... ...
  • Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu v Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 21 June 2011
    ...capital interest which became absolute on the father's death; and on which, therefore, estate duty is payable." 40 In Re Mathieson [1927] 1 Ch 283 the bankrupt had exercised a general power of appointment. It was held that the avoidance in a subsequent bankruptcy by Bankruptcy Act 1914, se......
  • Get Started for Free