Re Mayfair Property Company. Bartlett v Mayfair Property Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1898 |
| Date | 1898 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Bebo Investments Ltd Applicant/ Claimant v The Financial Secretary Respondent/Defendant
...137 Taxman 201 (RAJ). 15 Kammins Ballrooms Co. Ltd v Zenith Investment (Torquay) Ltd [1970] 2 All ER 871 at pages 892–893. 16 [1898] 2 Ch. 28 at 35. 17 [1993] 1 All ER 42 at page [2008] ECSC J0117-1 THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) Claim No. BVIH......
-
Hickman v Peacey
...its proper range, this rule of interpretation is still valid. "In order properly to interpret any statute" said Lord Lindley in In re Mayfair Property Company [1898] 2 Ch. 28 at P. 35, "it is as necessary now as it was when Lord Coke reported Heydon's Case to consider how the law stood whe......
-
William Jack Pike and Another v The Indian Hotels Company Ltd
...one (Bennion on Statutory Interpretation 5 th Edition, 2008, pages 263, 469 and 585). See also the comments of Lindley MR in Re Mayfair Property Co [1898] 2Ch28 at 35 and Lord Simon in Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschassenburg A.G [1975] A. C. 591 at 647. (vi) Th......
- R v Wright,
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1963
...(1911) Remer Gold Coast Report 604. 199 Re Kensington North Parliamentary Election (1960) 2 All E.R. 150 29 Re Mayfair Property Co. (1898) 2 Ch. 28, 35 102 Regal (Hastings Ltd.) v. Gulliver (1942) 1 All E.R. 378 40 Regina v. Hewgill (Dears 315). 9 Roast v. Roast (1938) P.17; (1937) 4 All E.......
-
Nigerian Legal System
...Suit No. FSC 413/1959; (1960) 1 N.S.C.C. 1 at 2. 1401. Mischief rule. (1) “In the words of Lindley, M.R., in Re Mayfair Property Co. (1898), 2 Ch. 28, 35: - “In order to properly interpret any statute it is as necessary now as it was when Lord Coke reported Heydon’s case to consider how the......