Re New Bullas Trading Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date16 December 1994
Date16 December 1994
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Nourse, Lord Justice Russell and Mr Justice Scott Baker

In re New Bullas Trading Ltd

Company - debenture - agreement can convert a fixed to a floating charge

Converting fixed to floating charge

A debenture agreement could lawfully provide for the creation of a fixed charge over the book debts of a company while those debts were uncollected and a floating charge over the proceeds once paid into a specified bank account.

The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment allowing an appeal by 3i plc from Mr Justice Knox's judgment ((1993) BCLC 1389) on an application brought by the administrative receivers of New Bullas Trading Ltd, Mr Roger Griffiths and Mr Andrew Pearce, two partners in Ernst Young, for the determination of the true construction of a debenture.

Also joined as respondents to the appeal were the Inland Revenue, the main preferential creditor, Customs and Excise, the Department of Employment and the Department of Social Security.

Clauses 3 and 4 of 3i's debenture contained a charge by the company of different categories of assets with the payment to 3i of all moneys and liabilities covenanted to be paid. The assets included book debts and the charges thereon were created as fixed charges.

Condition 12 in the debenture provided that the company was to get in debts in the ordinary course by demanding payment; that on a payment being received it was to be paid into a specified bank account where it had to be paid or otherwise dealt with in accordance with any written directions given by 3i; that prior to any crystallisation of the security and in the absence of any written direction by 3i the sum paid in would be released from the fixed charge and become subject to the floating charge.

On November 12, 1991 the administrative receivers were appointed, an event on the happening of which the debenture specified the moneys secured became immediately payable.

Proceeds from book debts were short of the claims of the company's preferential creditors. If the charge created by the debenture was a fixed charge then 3i plc would rank ahead of the preferential creditors and would be paid in full: if it did not achieve that result section 40 of the Insolvency Act 1986 operated to reverse the order of priorities.

Mr Jonathan Sumption, QC and Mr T D Chivers for 3i; Mr Launcelot Henderson for the Inland Revenue and the other preferential creditors.

LORD JUSTICE NOURSE said that he who lent money to a trading company neither...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Richard Dale Agnew and Another v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 June 2001
    ... ... It is closely modelled on the instrument which was the subject of the controversial decision of the English Court of Appeal in In re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 449 and may have been deliberately drafted in order to take advantage of that decision. The relevant provisions of the ... ...
  • National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 June 2005
    ...other cases at first instance (see eg. In re Portbase Clothing Ltd [1993] Ch 388 at 395/6). Moreover in In re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 485 the Court of Appeal took Siebe Gorman a step further. The New Bullas debenture was expressed to grant a fixed charge over the chargor's pr......
  • Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 June 2010
    ...Privy Council in Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2001] 2 AC 710 in preference to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 485, which the Privy Council had said was wrong. On appeal to the Court of Appeal Lord Phillips held (§ 58) that disappro......
  • COSCO BULK CARRIER Company Ltd v ARMADA SHIPPING SA and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 February 2011
    ...the longstanding authority of Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v. Barclays Bank Ltd [1979] 2 Lloyd's Rep 142 and the later decision of Re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 485 (CA) on the question whether debenture security over book debts constituted a fixed or floating charge. 29 It is perhaps su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Charges Over Company Book Debts
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 September 2004
    ...law. The law in England Decisions in Siebe Gorman & Co Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1979] Lloyd's Rep 142 and Re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 485 opened the doors to banks and other lenders to create a fixed charge over the present and future book debts of the company, while preserv......
  • Legal Issues In The Creation of Security - Part 2
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 29 June 2008
    ...40 [2005] UKHL 41 41 [1979] 2 Lloyd's Rep 142 42 [1986] BCLC 242 43 [1997] 1 BLCL 63 44 [2004] EWCA Civ 670 45 [1986] 3 All ER 673 46 [1994] 1 BCLC 485 47 [1994] LQR 592 48 [1999] LQR 14 49 [1994] 1 BCLC 485 50 A. Berg Charges Over Book Debts: A Reply [1995] JBL 433-471 at p436 51 [2001] 2 ......
4 books & journal articles
  • Mann v Secretary of State for Employment
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 63-6, November 2000
    • 1 November 2000
    ...It was consolidated in England – see Re Brightlife Ltd [1986] 4 All ER 673, [1987] Ch200, and Re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] BCLC 485, [1994] BCC 36 – but was severelydiscouraged by statute in Ireland, see s 115, Finance Act 1986 as limited by s 174, Finance Act 1995.15 [1999] IRLR 566.No......
  • IS THE FIXED CHARGE OVER BOOK DEBTS A VIABLE SECURITY ARRANGEMENT?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Bros Ltd[1986] BCLC 242. Re Brightlife Ltd[1987] Ch 200; Re a Company (No. 005009 of 1987)(1988) 4 BCC 424; Re New Bullas Trading Ltd[1994] BCC 36 and most recently, the Privy Council decision of Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue[2001] 3 WLR 454. 12 [1987] Ch 200. 13 [1986] BCLC 242. 1......
  • Note:WHEN IS AN ELEPHANT A BIRD?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...relied on, is even more “internal” in that sense, as there a Re New Bullas type clause was at issue (see Re New Bullas Trading Ltd[1994] 1 BCLC 485 (CA)), and that expressly created a floating charge over the proceeds of the book debts, over which there was a purported fixed charge. On the ......
  • FIXED AND FLOATING CHARGES OVER BOOK DEBTS: A POST MORTEM ON THE DEBATE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...This was a case which was heard on appeal from the Court of Appeal of New Zealand. 4 [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 142 (“Siebe Gorman”). 5 [1994] 1 BCLC 485 (“New Bullas”). 6 See W J Gough, Company Charges (Butterworths, 2nd Ed, 1996) ch 5; Roy Goode, Legal Problems of Credit and Security (Sweet & M......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT