Re Nisbet and Potts' Contract

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1906
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Tam Kam Cheong v Stephen Leong Kon Sang
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Jackson way Properties Ltd v Smith and Others
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 21 July 2023
    ...new type of equitable interest had been created.” The decision of Re Nisbet and Potts' Contract [1905] 1 Ch. 391 at 396 and on appeal [1906] 1 Ch. 386 is cited as authority confirming that 82 . Thus, as Megarry and Wade note at para. 16–036, by virtue of the decision in Tulk v Moxhay, as ......
  • Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 March 2011
    ...the relevant payment. As to that, it is common ground that the burden of proof is on the banks—see Re Nisbet and Potts' Contract [1906] 1 Ch 386. 95 So far as concerns this, the first of TPL's two proprietary claims, namely that based on Mr Cushnie's breach of fiduciary duties, against the......
  • The Serious Fraud Office v Litigation Capital Ltd (a company incorporated in the Marshall Islands) and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 May 2021
    ...for value without notice to prove that they gave valuable consideration and had no notice. In In re Nisbet and Potts' Contract [1906] 1 Ch 386, 404, Lord Collins MR said: “Has the appellant, the present vendor, shewn – as the burden is upon him to shew – that, having bought this land for v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Positive Covenants and Freehold Land Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...Ltd v Williams [2018] EWCA Civ 1514, [2018] 3 WLR 1105, [2018] BLR 684, [2018] Env LR 35 89–90, 203 Nisbet and Potts’ Contract, Re [1906] 1 Ch 386, 75 LJ Ch 238, [1904–07] All ER Rep 865, CA 162 Oceanic Village Ltd v United Attractions Ltd [2000] Ch 234, [2000] 2 WLR 476, [2000] 1 All ER 97......
  • Assignment of Benefit
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Positive Covenants and Freehold Land Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...at all times observe, perform and keep the said stipulations contained in the Second Schedule hereto. 22 Re Nisbet and Potts’ Contract [1906] 1 Ch 386. 23 [1980] 1 WLR 594 at 605. 24 ‘Unreported in the usual series of law reports but fully set out in 19 Conveyancer 262 .’ Also reported in (......
  • OF PROHIBITIONS ON ASSIGNMENTS, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND NEGATIVE PLEDGES IN COMMERCIAL LAW: CLOGS ON COMMERCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...of a transaction is distinct from its nature at law.” 55 Re Nisbet & Potts Contract per Farwell J [1905] 1 Ch 391 at 398; per Romer LJ [1906] 1 Ch 386 at 403 (Court of Appeal). See, however, AP Bell, supra n 41 at 213—216, who thinks that under De Mattos an equitable interest does come into......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT