Re Norris
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1888 |
| Year | 1888 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
W v W
...[1950] 2 All E.R. 1035, considered. (2) Levene v. Inland Rev. Commrs., [1928] A.C. 217; [1928] All E.R. Rep. 746. (3) Norris, In reUNK(1888), 4 T.L.R. 452, followed. (4) R. v. Barnet London Borough Council, ex p. Shah, [1983] 2 A.C. 309; [1983] 1 All E.R. 226, followed. Legislation construe......
-
Ikimi v Ikimi
...can have only one habitual residence at any time. He said at 342F: "I note that in the nineteenth century bankruptcy case in Re Norris [1888] 4 TLR 452 it was accepted that one person could be ordinarily resident in two countries at the same time. This is, I have no doubt, a significant fea......
-
Hankinson v HM Revenue and Customs (No. 3)
...countries at the same time, he may be ordinarily resident in two countries at the same time: Re Norris, ex p Reynolds (1888) 5 Morr 111, 4 TLR 452; Shah v Barnet London Borough Council [1983] 1 All ER 226 at 235, [1983] 2 AC 309 at (ix) It is wrong to conduct a search for the place where a ......
-
Dmitry Lazarichev v Tsimafei Lyndou
...a person may be resident in two countries at the same time, he may be ordinarily resident in two countries at the same time: Re Norris (1888) 4 TLR 452; R v Barnet LBC ex p Shah [1983] 2 AC 309, 342; (ix) It is wrong to conduct a search for the place where a person has his permanent base or......
Request a trial to view additional results