Re Ogden (H. J.). Brydon v Samuel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Date1933
Year1933

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Leahy v Attorney General (N.S.W.)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
    ... ... an originating summons issued by the trustees and it was held by Myers J. (1) that there was no territorial limitation in the will which would ... (sitting at first instance in the Chancery Division) said in In re Ogden, F22 a gift to a voluntary association of persons for the general ... ...
  • Wahr-Hansen v Bridge Trust Company Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • November 28, 1997
    ...(16) Nightingale v. GoulburnENR(1848), 2 Ph. 594; 41 E.R. 1072; [1843-60] All E.R. Rep. 420. (17) Ogden (H.J.), In re, Brydon v. Samuel, [1933] Ch. 678; [1933] All E.R. Rep. 720, distinguished. (18) Pardoe, In re, McLaughlin v. Att.-Gen., [1906] 2 Ch. 184; (1906), 75 L.J. Ch. 455, considere......
  • Re Leek, deceased ; Darwen (Baron) v Leek
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 20, 1967
    ...this footing to make up their minds and arrive at a decision. 7 On the other view the law is, as shown by the leading case of Re ( Ogden 1933 Ch. 678), a decision of Mr. Justice Tomlin, and recited in Gestetner (supra) - that the donee of the power must be in a position to know all the obje......
  • Re Harpur's Will Trusts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • July 4, 1961
    ... ... M. Attorney-General ... MR IAN CAMPBELL, Q.C. and MR J.E. VINELOTT (instructed by Messrs Freshfields) appeared as Counsel for the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free