Re P. (Infants)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1967
Date1967

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Re D. (A Minor) (Justices' Decision: Review)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...would exercise its jurisdiction and consider the welfare of the child. In re K. (K. S. J.) (An Infant)[1966] 1 W.L.R. 1241; In re P. (Infants) [1967] 1 W.L.R. 818; In re P. (A. J.) (An Infant) [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1976 and In re D. (Minors) (Wardship: Jurisdiction) [1973] Fam. 179 distinguished.......
  • Re P. (A. J.) (an Infant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... - Whether relief genuinely sought outside magistrates' powers - Whether other special reasons, arising from non-disclosures of facts or change of circumstances or complexity of the issues raised justifying interposition of wardship jurisdiction - Appropriate form of order - Guardianship of Infants Act, 1925 ( 15 & 16 Geo. 5 , c. 45 ) , s. 7 (3) ... By an order made under the Guardianship of Infants Acts, 1886 and 1925 , magistrates awarded a mother the custody of her two-year-old daughter, whom the father had removed from her control without her consent. The father did not comply ... ...
  • Re S. (M) (an Infant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...2 W.L.R. 1; [1964] 3 All E.R. 977, C.A. X - 's Settlement, In re [1945] Ch. 44; [1945] 1 All E.R. 100. PRELIMINARY ISSUEIn re P. (Infants) [1967] 1 W.L.R. 818, 826 applied. (2) That while the court was slow to abdicate its jurisdiction where the ward was in this country, the ward in the pre......
  • Re H. (A Minor) (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 October 1977
    ...reasons for doing so. This is based on the concept: of comity and on thedesirability of preventing multiplicity of proceedings: re P (infants) (1967) All England Reports, 229, per Mr. Justice Stamp (as he then was) and re D (1973) family Division, per Mr. Justice Bagnall. In both these case......
  • Get Started for Free