Re P. (Infants)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1967 |
| Year | 1967 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Re H. (A Minor) (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
...reasons for doing so. This is based on the concept: of comity and on thedesirability of preventing multiplicity of proceedings: re P (infants) (1967) All England Reports, 229, per Mr. Justice Stamp (as he then was) and re D (1973) family Division, per Mr. Justice Bagnall. In both these case......
-
Re T. (Minors) (Wardship: Jurisdiction)
...application despite the fact that a magistrates' court is already seised of jurisdiction in respect of the same child. In Re P (Infants) [1967] 1 WLR 818 Stamp, J held that despite the fact that a custody order had already been made in a magistrates' court the High Court could nevertheless ......
-
Child and Family Services of Winnipeg v. L.L. and C.L., (1994) 95 Man.R.(2d) 16 (CA)
...doing so. This is based on the concept of comity and on the desirability of preventing multiplicity of proceedings: Re P (infants) , [1967] 2 All E.R. 229, per Stamp, J., and Re D (minors) (wardship: jurisdiction), [1973] 2 All E.R. 993, per Bagnall, J." [40] There were, however, special re......
-
Re T (Minors) (Care Proceedings: Wardship)
...the fact that the two local authorities concerned wish to proceed in accordance with the statutory code." 17 She cited the case of In re P (Infants) [1967] 1 W.L.R. 818 where Stamp J. held that despite the fact that a custody order had already been made in a magistrates' court the High Cour......
Request a trial to view additional results