Re Pamstock Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date05 January 1994
Date05 January 1994
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

In re Pamstock Ltd

Company - director - serious default

Serious company default

In the context of the failure by the secretary of a company, also one of its two directors, to put in place an adequate system of management, and his allowing the company to continue to trade beyond the point at which trading should have ceased, the failure to file accounts and returns promptly was also a serious default.

Mr Justice Vinelott so held in the Chancery Division on November 24, when disqualifying a former director of Pamstock Ltd for two years.

HIS LORDSHIP said that since the decision of the Court of Appeal in In re Seven Oaks Stationers (Retail) LtdUNK ((1990) BCC 765) it seemed to have become the practice of the Official Receiver to include in his report every matter which could be the possible subject of a complaint.

While it was right that he should put before the court details of all companies in which a respondent had been a director and which had gone...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Re Grayan Building Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 November 1994
    ... ... 10F–G , 11B–H , 14G–H , 15A , F–16A ) ... Dicta of Peter Gibson J. in In re Bath Glass Ltd. [ 1988 ] B.C.L.C. 329 , 332 and In re Pamstock Ltd. [ 1994 ] 1 B.C.L.C. 716 approved ... Dictum of Lindsay J. in In re Polly Peck International Plc. (No. 2) [ 1994 ] 1 B.C.L.C. 574 , 583 considered ... Decision of Arden J. reversed ... The following cases are referred to in the judgments: ... Bath Glass Ltd., In re ... ...
  • Re Kentford Securities Ltd: Director of Corporate Enforcement v McCann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 November 2010
    ...LTD, IN RE; DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT v COLLERY 2007 1 IR 580 2006/15/3109 2006 IEHC 67 PAMSTOCK LTD, IN RE 1994 BCC 264 1994 1 BCLC 716 POLLY PECK INTERNATIONAL PLC (IN ADMINISTRATION), IN RE; SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE & INDUSTRY v ELLIS & ORS (NO 2) 1993 BCC 890 1994 1 BCLC 57......
  • Re AG (Manchester) Ltd ((in Liquidation)); Official Receiver v Watson and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 24 January 2008
    ...by way of mitigation on the length of disqualification… It follows that I agree with the approach of Vinelott J in In re Pamstock Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 716, [1994] BCC 264 when he said that it was his duty to disqualify a director whose conduct “fell short of the standard of conduct which is t......
  • The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy v Edward Charles Ormond Steven
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 June 2018
    ...attempting to assess more generally his present suitability for directorship — per Walters & Davis-White, op. cit. at para. 4–12, citing Re Pamstock Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 716, 737, as relied upon by Mr Bamford — does not prevent the court from considering what the director might reasonably have......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Wrongful Trading: An Impotent Remedy?
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 4-1, March 1996
    • 1 March 1996
    ...Cork Report p. 404, para. 1805, Re Produce Marketing Consortium Ltd (1989) 5 BCC 569 per Knox J. at p. 595. (16) See Re Pamstock Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 716 per Vinelott J at p. 737 e-f. (17) See Hicks A. (1993) 'Advising on Wrongful Trading', 14 The Company Lawyer 16. (18) See ref. 17. (19) [199......
  • Leave to Act as a Company Director Following Disqualification: Re Barings plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Financial Crime No. 7-1, March 1999
    • 1 March 1999
    ...This impression is strengthened by the emphasis on rationales such as deterrence and denuncia-tion (on the latter see Re Pamstock Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 716, 737, [1994] BCC 264, 282) more usually associated with crim-inal law. (12) See eg Re New Generation Engineers Ltd [1993] BCLC 435; Re Fire......
  • What Makes a Director Fit? An Analysis of the Workings of Section 17 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh Law Review No. , September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...of conduct which is today expected of a director of a company which enjoys the privilege of limited liability”.2525In re Pamstock Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 716 at 736. This test of “unfit” conduct is much closer to the aims of corporate governance measures that, together with statutory directors’ d......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT