Re Parliamentary Privilege Act, 1770

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1958
Date1958
Year1958
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Rost v Edwards
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • February 1, 1990
  • Times Publishing Bhd and Others v Sivadas
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • July 4, 1988
    ...Goffin v Donnelly (1881) 6 QBD 307 (refd) Lake v King (1667) 1 Wms Saund 131; 85 ER 137 (folld) Parliamentary Privilege Act 1770, In re [1958] AC 331 (refd) R v Murphy (1986) 64 ALR 498 (refd) R v Secretary of State for trade, Ex parte Anderson Strathclyde plc [1983] 2 All ER 233 (refd) Riv......
  • Poovalingam v Rajbansi
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(QB) at 381d-j; Rost v Edwards and Others [1990] 2 QB 460 at 469D; see also In the matter of the H Parliamentary Privilege Act, 1770 [1958] 2 All ER 329 (PC) at 332h-i). According to Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England 4th ed by R M Kerr (1876) at 132, the privileges of Parliam......
  • Jeremy Hagan Whaley And Trevor Adams And Julia Margaret Furness For Interdict And Interim Interdict V.
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • November 26, 1999
    ...Courts will not generally investigate how the Westminster Parliament is conducting its affairs. (See Re Parliamentary Privilege Act 1770 1958 A.C. 331. These observations are merely designed to focus the fact that in my opinion the Scottish Parliament is a subordinate legislation created by......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Parliamentary Privilege and the Bill of Rights
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 21-5, September 1958
    • September 1, 1958
    ...for the House to take any punitive measures against a Erskine May, op. eit. (16th ed.), 173; Re Parliamentary Prioilege Act, 1770 [1958] A.C. 331 at 354. Erskine May.,op. cit. (16th cd.). 171. Cf. Chn/fers v. Goldsmid [I8941 1 Q.B. 18G. (1839) 9 A. & E. at 203; see also Anson. Law and Custo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT