Re Pearce Duff & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1960
Date1960
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Re Barry Artist Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Re Bailey, Hay & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...C.A. Orton v. Bristow (1916) 32 T.L.R. 352, C.A. Oxted Motor Co. Ltd., In re [1921] 3 K.B. 32, D.C. Pearce Duff & Co. Ltd., In re [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1014; [1960] 3 All E.K. Railway Sleepers Supply Co., In re (1885) 29 Ch.D. 204. Ramsden v. Dyson (1865) L.R. 1 H.L. 129, H.L.(E.). Rex v. Ess......
  • Cane v Jones
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...[1921] 3 K.B. 32, D.C. applied. In re Pearce Duff & Co. Ltd. [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1014 and In re Moorgate Mercantile Holdings Ltd. [1980] 1 W.L.R. 227 considered. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Consolidated Nickel Mines Ltd., In re [1914] 1 Ch. 883. Duomatic Ltd., In re......