Re Petition of Right
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1915 |
| Date | 1915 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Qarase v Bainimarama
-
Burmah Oil Company (Burma Trading) Ltd v Lord Advocate
...De Keyser's Royal HotelELR, [1920] A. C. 508, Lord Dunedin at pp. 520–530, Lord Atkinson at p. 544, read with pp. 538–540 and 542. 16 [1915] 3 K. B. 649, Lord Cozens-Hardy, M.R., at p. 659. 17 Reference was made to Commercial and Estates Co. of Egypt v. The Board of TradeELR, [1925] 1 K. B.......
-
Department of Agriculturefor Ireland, Rooney v(No. 2)
...(Note: Sub-s. 4 provides for the determination of compensation by an arbitrator.) (2) [1919] 1 I. R. 302. (1) [1919] 2 Ch. 197. (1) [1915] 3 K. B. 649. (2) [1918] 2 Ch. 101. (3) [1919] 2 Ch. 197. (1) 3 Howell's State Trials, (2) 12 Rep. 12. (3) 4 C. B. N. S. 334. (1) [1919] 2 Ch. 191. (1) [......
-
Chandler and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions
...v Poole Corporation [1926] Ch. 66 Warrington, L.J. made the point just as forcibly in relation to an educational authority as in In re a Petition of Right [1915] 3 K.B. 649 he did in relation to the Crown. At page 91 of the former case he said:? "With the question whether a particular pol......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Democracy, Liberty and the Prerogative: The Displacement of Inherent Executive Power by Statute
...Act 1842 (UK) 5 & 6 Vict 1; Defence of the Realm Consolidation Act 1914 (UK) 4 & 5 Geo 5 and the regulations made under those acts. 69 [1915] 3 KB 649. 70 Ibid 660. 71 Swinfen Eady MR held that Re a Petition of Right had no application to the De Keyser' s Royal Hotel case, which was concern......
-
Law and war: individual rights, executive authority, and judicial power in England during World War I.
...as their priorities dictated. (226.) The prerogative was considered part of the common law. See, e.g., In re Petition of Right, [1915] 3 K.B. 649, 659; Barendt, supra note 63, at 12. Judicial suspicions of the prerogative in situations not involving aliens, deriving largely from the use of ......