Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1964 |
| Year | 1964 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Re Wools (LHF) Ltd
...that proposition. I quite see that the mere fact of the existence of a cross-claim may not be enough, although the Court of Appeal in the Portman case (on which the learned judge below did not comment) did not seem to take that view. 19 However that may be, those are all matters of discreti......
- Chng Gim Huat Pte Ltd; Ng Tai Tuan and Another
-
Metalform Asia Pte Ltd v Holland Leedon Pte Ltd
...deal with a cross-claim case. 65 Nourse LJ examined two previous Court of Appeal decisions, viz, In re Portman Provincial Cinemas, Ltd (1964) 108 Sol J 581 (“Portman”) and In re L H F Wools Ltd [1970] Ch 27 (“Wools”), which were both cross-claim cases, and concluded that this practice in cr......
-
Hammonds (A Firm) v Pro-Fit USA
... ... of special circumstances as shown by Re LHF Wools Ltd [1970] Ch 27 affirming Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd (1964) 108 Sol Jo 581 ... 37 In practical ... ...
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
WINDING UP PETITIONS FOUNDED ON A BONA FIDE DISPUTED DEBT
...a Company (No 009080 of 1992)[1993] BCLC 269 at 273i—274c; Re Pendigo Ltd, supra, note 91. See also Re Portman Provincial Cinemas Ltd(1964) 108 Sol Jo 581; Re Euro Hotel (Belgravia) Ltd, supra, note 12, at 1078g—1079b; Consolidated Electronic Industries Ltd v Philips Electrical Industries o......
-
Lost in translation: The need for the judicious use of comparative law
...creditors’ winding–up applications in which a cross-claim is raised in opposition.8 Ter Beek supra note 5 at 333G–H.9 Ibid at 333H–I.10 [1964] 108 SJ 581 (CA).11 [1969] 3 All ER 882 (CA).12 Ter Beek supra note 5 at 334A. © Juta and Company (Pty) 5LOST IN TRANSLATION: THE NEED FOR THE JUDICI......