Re Potter's Will Trusts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1943 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Ann Marie Llewellyn Young v Louise Hilda Llewellyn
...the testatrix to have meant by the words which she used.’ 55 In Charles v Barzey (op. cit) reliance was also placed on the case of Re Potter's Will Trust [1944] Ch 70 at page 77 where Lord Greene had stated that: ‘It is a fundamental rule in the interpretation of wills that effect must be ......
-
Charles v Barzey
...understood the testatrix to have meant by the words which she used. Furthermore, as Lord Greene MR said in In re Potter's Will Trusts [1944] Ch 70, 77: "It is a fundamental rule in the interpretation of wills that effect must be given, so far as possible, to the words which the testator ha......
-
Sylvia Gayle-Henry v Lloyd Gayle and Cedric Gayle
...to a dispute. See Theobald on Wills, 15th edition, Sweet & Maxwell, 1993 at 199 and Perrin v. Morgan [1943] AC 399 at 406. [34] In Re Potter's Will Trust [1944] Ch 70 at 77 Lord Greene stated that: “It is a fundamental rule in the interpretation of wills that effect must be given, so far as......
-
La Roche v La Roche
...to have, would have understood the testatrix to have meant by the words which she used. Furthermore as Lord Greene MR said in Re Potter's Will Trust (1944) Ch. 70, 77— ‘It is a fundamental rule in the interpretation of wills that effect must be given, so far as possible to the words which t......
Request a trial to view additional results