Re Pretoria Pietersburg Railway Company (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1904 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Re Bancredit Cayman Ltd
...752; [1996] 1 All E.R. 431, followed. (3) Jones v. Brien(1995), 13 ACLC 99, applied. (4) Pretoria Pietersburg Ry. Co. (No. 2), In re, [1904] 2 Ch. 359; (1904), 73 L.J.Ch. 704, not followed. (5) Rosseau Pty. Ltd. v. Jay-O-Bees Ltd. (2004), 50 ACSR 565; sub nom. In re Jay-O-Bees, [2004] NSWSC......
-
Re Bancredit Cayman
...52 W.I.R. 134, considered. (4) Gilbert v. EndeanELR(1878), 9 Ch. D. 259, considered. (5) Pretoria Pietersburg Ry. Co. (No. 2), In re, [1904] 2 Ch. 359; (1904), 73 L.J. Ch. 704; 91 L.T. 285, dicta of Buckley J. followed. (6) Savings & Inv. Bank Ltd. v. Gasco Invs. (Netherlands) B.V. (No. 2),......
-
Re Cybervest Fund
...KG v. Porzelack (UK) Ltd., [1987] 1 W.L.R. 420; [1987] 1 All E.R. 1074, followed. (10) Pretoria Pietersburg Ry. Co. (No. 2), In re, [1904] 2 Ch. 359, applied. Legislation continued: Grand Court Rules, O.23, r.1(1): The relevant terms of this sub-rule are set out at para. 22. Companies Law (......
- Coldham v The Raub Australian Gold Mining Company, Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results