Re R (A Minor: Abduction)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
-
In the matter of E
...The court has to consider whether the views are genuine and are expressed of the child’s own free will. (See Re R (a minor: abduction) (1992) 1 FLR 105.) It is for the judge to decide whether the child’s objection and degree of maturity should be taken into account and whether or not furthe......
-
NT v LT
...on the use of the word ‘preference’ in contra-distinction to ‘objection’, including the decisions of In re R (A Minor: Abduction) [1992] 1 FLR 105, 107–108 (Bracewell J); In re S [1993] Fam 242, 250 (Balcombe LJ); and In re LC (Children) (Reunite International Child Abduction Centre interve......
-
C.K. v C.K.; Re P.K. and C.K.
...ART 40.3.1 MAGEE V AG 1974 IR 284 W V W UNREP LARDNER 19.2.92 1992/13/4346 F V F UNREP CARNEY 24.11.92 R (A MINOR)(ABDUCTION), IN RE 1992 1 FLR 105 K V W & ORS 1990 ILRM 121 Synopsis: INFANTS Protection Child - Residence - Abduction - Father's initiative - Wife - Consent - Absence - Famil......
-
Jek v Lcyp
...and preference argument 9.5 A distinction between preference and objection was drawn by Bracewell J in In re R (A Minor: Abduction) [1992] 1 FLR 105, 107-108: ‘ The wording of the article is so phrased that I am satisfied that before the court can consider exercising discretion, there must ......
Request a trial to view additional results