Re Redman (Builders) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1964
Year1964
Date1964
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Emporium Jaya (Bentong) Sdn Bhd ((in Liquidation)) v Emporium Jaya (Jerantut) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Re Aro Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 November 1979
    ...creditors of an insolvent company are to rank pari passu (subject to statutory provisions as to preferential payments); see in Re Redman Builders Ltd., (1964) 1 weekly Law Reports, 541. In order to achieve this result, there are provisions which restrict the right of a creditor to make use......
  • COSCO BULK CARRIER Company Ltd v ARMADA SHIPPING SA and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 February 2011
    ...of each case": see Re Grosvenor Metal Co Ltd [1950] Ch 63, at 65 per Vaisey J, Re Suidair International Airways Ltd [1951] Ch 165, Re Redman (Builders) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 541, Re Aro Co Ltd [1980] Ch 196 at 209 (CA) and, most recently, Bourne v. Charit-Email Technology Partnership LLP [2010] ......
  • Geoffrey John Mitchell and Another v Buckingham International Plc and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 February 1998
    ...represent them, and it may well be that each of them could put up as good a case as the applicant". 30 He referred with approval to Re Redman (Builders) Ltd 1964 1 WLR 541, a decision of Pennycuick J, and said that "weighty reasons" were needed to set aside the general rule of pari passu di......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...execution at the commencement of the winding up he is in the same position as any other unsecured creditor (Re Redman (Builders) Ltd[1964] 1 WLR 541 at 546). Thus, weighty reasons are necessary to justify the court in exercising its discretion to interfere (In re Caribbean Products (Yam Imp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT