Re Redman (Builders) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1964
Year1964
Date1964
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Emporium Jaya (Bentong) Sdn Bhd ((in Liquidation)) v Emporium Jaya (Jerantut) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Re Aro Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 November 1979
    ...creditors of an insolvent company are to rank pari passu (subject to statutory provisions as to preferential payments); see in Re Redman Builders Ltd., (1964) 1 weekly Law Reports, 541. In order to achieve this result, there are provisions which restrict the right of a creditor to make use......
  • Re Caribbean Products (Yam Importers) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 November 1965
    ... ... The cases were all reviewed by Mr Justice Pennycuick in In re Rodman (Builders) Limited , ( 1964 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 541 ), and I do not think I need go through them again, for in the end they show, I think, that though ... It does not know enough about the facts. The general rule in winding-up, as observed by Mr Justice Pennycuick at page 546 of the report in Redman (Builders) Limited , is that all creditors rank pari passu if not secured, and weighty reasons are needed to set this aside. I do not feel that the ... ...
  • RZH SETIA JAYA SDN BHD vs SIME DARBY ENERGY SOLUTIONS SDN BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 9 July 2020
    ...of a company. A party with the benefit of an adjudication decision remains an unsecured creditor. In Re Redman (Builders) Ltd. [1964] 1 All ER 851 the Court held at page 855 that the basic scheme of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act and the Companies Act is that the unsecured creditors r......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Insolvency Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...execution at the commencement of the winding up he is in the same position as any other unsecured creditor (Re Redman (Builders) Ltd[1964] 1 WLR 541 at 546). Thus, weighty reasons are necessary to justify the court in exercising its discretion to interfere (In re Caribbean Products (Yam Imp......