Re Romer & Haslam
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1893 |
| Year | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
61 cases
-
O Palomo SA v Turner & Co; Turner & Company v O Palomo SA
...payment does not have this effect. 51 The reasons for the distinction and why it is important were spelt out by Lord Justice Bowen in In re Romer & Haslam [1893] 2 Q.B. 286 in a passage which was quoted in the judgment of Roskill L.J. in Davidsons (a firm) v. Jones-Fenleigh [1980] Costs L.R......
-
Richard Slade and Company Solicitors v Mr Jugmohan Boodia and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
...not intended to have a wider application. Counsel pointed out that the concept of interim statute bills was recognised as far back as Re Romer & Haslam [1893] 2 QB 286 decided well before the CPR. Counsel drew attention to the transcript of the proceedings before Master James in which at pa......
-
Bolt & Nut Company (Tipton) Ltd v Rowlands Nicholls & Company Ltd
...on presentation. I think that appears from two cases cited to us. There is the case in 1893, 2 Queen's Bench, at page 286, of In re Romer and Kaslam, which I need only mention because this was not really seriously contested. And there is a case which states that as between traders that is a......
-
The Winros Partnership (Formerly known as Rosenblatt Solicitors) v Global Energy Horizons Coporation
...questions of fact and that the onus is on the Solicitors to show that what is delivered to the client amounts to a statute bill ( Re Romer and Haslam [1893] 2 Q.B. 286 at 298). The contest related to whether the Master was entitled to find, as she did in paragraph [108] of her judgment, th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Profession
...date’: Davidsons v Jones-Fenleigh 1979 D No 2133 (Transcript: Association); (1980) 124 Sol Jo 204 at 204 (following Re Romer and Haslam [1893] 2 QB 286). It must always be a question of fact whether the solicitor“s intention was that each successive bill was delivered as a self-contained bi......