Re S (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1997
Date1997
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Re T (Abduction: Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 September 2007
    ...2 AC 291 GUARDIANSHIP OF INFANTS ACT 1964 S11(4) THOMSON v THOMSON 1994 3 SCR 551 S (ABDUCTION: CHILDREN: SEPARATE REPRESENTATION), IN RE 1997 1 FLR 486 BRUSSELS CONVENTION 1968 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S3(1) EUROPEAN CONVE......
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 November 2007
    ...Society [1996] 1 I.L.R.M. 297. W.O'R. v. E.H. (Guardianship) [1996] 2 I.R. 248. Re S. (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation) [1997] 1 F.L.R. 486. The State (Nicolaou) v. An Bord Uchtála [1966] I.R. 567; (1966) 102 I.L.T.R. 1. Thomson v. Thomson [1994] 3 Can. S.C.R. 551. Re V-B (mino......
  • Re C (Abduction: Seperate representation of children)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 14 March 2008
    ...J. in Re B it can legitimately be said that Charles J. helpfully drew upon the decision of Wall J. (as he then was) in Re S (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation) [1997] 1 FLR 486 to elaborate examples of what can now be described as the first limb of the Re M test. In Re S Wall J.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT