Re S (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
Year1997
Date1997

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Re T (Abduction: Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 September 2007
    ...2 AC 291 GUARDIANSHIP OF INFANTS ACT 1964 S11(4) THOMSON v THOMSON 1994 3 SCR 551 S (ABDUCTION: CHILDREN: SEPARATE REPRESENTATION), IN RE 1997 1 FLR 486 BRUSSELS CONVENTION 1968 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S2 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 S3(1) EUROPEAN CONVE......
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 November 2007
    ...Society [1996] 1 I.L.R.M. 297. W.O'R. v. E.H. (Guardianship) [1996] 2 I.R. 248. Re S. (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation) [1997] 1 F.L.R. 486. The State (Nicolaou) v. An Bord Uchtála [1966] I.R. 567; (1966) 102 I.L.T.R. 1. Thomson v. Thomson [1994] 3 Can. S.C.R. 551. Re V-B (mino......
  • Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 3 February 2000
    ...on a matter with which your Lordships are not concerned. 16It appears from In re S. (Abduction: Children: Separate Representation) [1997] 1 F.L.R 486 that the High Court of New Zealand considered that it had rights of custody in respect of the children who were the subject of that applicati......
  • Get Started for Free