Re S (Brussels Ii: Recognition: Best Interests of Child) (No 1)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2004 |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Re L (A Child) (Recognition of Foreign Order)
...to public policy taking into account the best interests of the child. 30 Macur J treated the decision of Holman J in Re S (Brussels II: Best Interests of Child) (No 1) [2003] EWHC 2115 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR 571, as being the touch stone. From it she derived the principle (para [29]) that "t......
-
Bedford Bourough Council v M
...Health and Social Care Trust v. D.S. [2012] 3 I.R. 815 applying Re S ( Brussels II: Recognition: Best Interests of Child) (No. 1) [2004] 1 F.L.R. 571; Bamberski v. Krombach ( Case C-7/98) [2001] 3 W.L.R. 488; In re D [2016] 1 W.L.R. 2469 at 2497, para. 108 per Briggs LJ.) 50 The applica......
-
MD v CT
...the application of that principle by the original court has been considered in a number of domestic cases. In Re S (Brussels II: Recognition: Best Interests of Child) (No. 1) [2004] 1 FLR 571 Holman J accepted that "it is possible to contemplate a situation in which an order of the foreign ......
-
Re L (A Child)
...as to its substance. The father therefore succeeded in his appeal in relation to art 23(a) (see [46], [53], [54], [56], below); Re S [2004] 1 FLR 571 applied; Krombach v Bamberski Case C-7/98, [2001] All ER (EC) 584, LAB v KB (Abduction: Brussels II Revised) [2010] 2 FLR 1664 considered. Ca......
Request a trial to view additional results