Re S (Care proceedings: Human Rights)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Civ 1383 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
London Borough of Camden v RZ (First Respondent) HZ (Second Respondent) DZ and SZ (by Their Children's Guardian Cynthia Tobierre) (Third and Fourth Respondent)
...they were allowed to return to the care of their parents ( Re B (Interim Care Order) [2010] 2 FLR 283 cited with approval in Re S (Care Proceedings: Human Rights) [2012] 2 FLR 209). 70 The removal of children from the care of their parents constitutes a serious interference in the Art 8 rig......
-
R (on the application of H) v Kingston Upon Hull City Council KS, as, SS, TS and FS (Interested Parties)
...for an ICO is made – and all the more so when removal is in issue. This issue was addressed by the Court of Appeal in Re S (Care Proceedings: Human Rights) [2010 ] EWCA Civ 1383 [2012 ] 2 FLR 2009, where Sir Nicholas Wall P (with whom Arden LJ and Wilson LJ, as he then was, agreed) said tha......
-
#
...with Article 8 rights: see Re S, Re W [2002] UKHL 10, Re V (Care Proceedings: Human Rights Claims) [2004] EWCA Civ 54 and Re S (Care Proceedings: Human Rights) [2010] EWCA Civ 1383. Judge Cronin was clearly under the mistaken impression that she was not authorised to hear an application ......
-
Re A-W (A Child) and C (Children)
...the care proceedings. That seems to me to be in accordance with the practice approved by the Court of Appeal in the case of Re S [2010] EWCA CIV 1383. I first dealt with this case on 18 th February 2013 in the county court, on a first appointment in respect of A's case, and I transferred th......