Re S (Deceased) (Forfeiture Rule)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Dunbar v Plant
...of justice is to exercise the powers given by the Forfeiture Act. 114This conclusion was not shared by Peter Gibson J. in Re H Deceased [1996] 1 WLR 235. In that case the Plaintiff had stabbed his wife to death when under the illusion, induced by a reaction to an anti-depressant drug, that......
-
Rooney v Cardona
...on the wording of the policy as recorded in the report, though conceivably there was some further wording which is not recorded. In Re S [1996] 1 WLR 235 (a case concerned with the Forfeiture Act 1982) Rattee J also seems to have been rather puzzled by Griffiths v Fleming although he follow......
-
Murphy and another v Murphy and Others
...FCR 797, [1993] 1 FLR 1001, CA. Reed v Royal Exchange Assurance Co (1795) Peake (Add Cas) 70, 170 ER 198. S (decd), Re[1996] 3 FCR 357, [1996] 1 WLR 235, [1996] 1 FLR AppealThe appellants appealed from the decision of Judge Mosely QC whereby he held that the life policy in the instant case ......
-
L v M (A Child)
...executors of the deceased policyholder as well. 24 I should record that we were referred to Griffiths v Fleming [1909] 1 KB 805, In re S [1996] 1 WLR 235, Powell v Osborne [1993] 1 FLR 1001 and In re McKerrell [1912] 2Ch 648, in each of which a policy of life insurance was considered, but n......
1 books & journal articles
-
High Court
...circumstances precludes aperson who has unlawfully killed another from acquiring any benefit inconsequence of the killing. Re Sdeceased[1996]1 WLR 235 was concernedwith consequences of the application of the forfeiture rule. There, ahusband killed his wife and, when charged with murder, ple......