Re S (Hospital patient: Court's jurisdiction)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1995
Year1995
Date1995
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Re TF (an Adult: Residence)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 June 2000
    ...have been likely to be the subject of a care order under section 31 of the Children Act 1989 as are her 7 siblings. In re S (Hospital Patient: Court's Jurisdiction) [1996] Fam. 1 Sir Thomas Bingham MR at page 18 reviewed the declaratory jurisdiction in respect of those without the ability t......
  • Re a Local Authority (Inquiry: Restraint on publication)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 27 November 2003
    ...has also been applied in cases unconnected with surgical or medical treatment. In the case of re S (Hospital Patient: Foreign Curator) [1995] Fam 26 the question arose as to the welfare of an elderly man of 75 who had a stroke and was under a disability. The issue between the family and the......
  • B Borough Council v S and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 23 October 2006
    ...without notice orders), Re[2000] 3 FCR 706, [2001] 1 All ER 362, [2001] 1 WLR 211. S (hospital patient: courts jurisdiction), Re[1995] 1 FCR 637, [1995] 1 All ER 449, [1995] Fam 26, [1995] 2 WLR 38, [1995] 1 FLR 302; affd [1995] 3 FCR 496, [1995] 3 All ER 290, [1996] Fam 1, [1995] 3 WLR 78,......
  • Local Authority v Health Authority and another (disclosure: restriction on publication)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...(identification: restriction on publication), Re[2003] EWCA Civ 963, [2003] 2 FCR 577. S (hospital patient: court’s jurisdiction), Re[1995] 1 FCR 637, [1995] 1 All ER 449, [1995] Fam 26, [1995] 2 WLR 38, [1995] 1 FLR 302; affd[1995] 3 FCR 496, [1995] 3 All ER 290, [1996] Fam 1, [1995] 3 WLR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Reviews
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 61-3, May 1998
    • 1 May 1998
    ...man’s wishes. The question is premature in the absence of relevantexcerpts from Hale J’s detailed findings at first instance ((1995) Fam 26) and herre-hearing of the merits of the case ((1996) Fam 23).Some questions in the book are directly relevant to the text and enable the readerto analy......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT