Re S (Parental Order)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam)
Date2009
Year2009
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Re Ij (A Child) (Overseas Surrogacy : Parental Order)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • D & G v ED & DD (1st & 2nd Respondents) A & B (by their Children's Guardian) (3rd& 4th Respondents)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 1 April 2015
    ...of payments in this court and I have been referred to and apply namely Re X and Y (foreign surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam), Re S (parental order) [2009] EWHC 2977 Jud and Re L (a minor) [2010] EWHC 3146 (Fam). In Re X and Y (2008), Mr Justice Hedley said at [21]: "In relation to the publi......
  • Z, Re (Foreign Surrogacy: Allocation of Work : Guidance on Parental Order Reports)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • Invalid date
    ...case of the abuse of public policy”. This approach which was developed by Hedley J and remains as he set out in In re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977; [2010] 1 FLR 1156, at para 7:“This clearly raises matters of public policy and those matters really relate to, as it seems to me, three ......
  • Re X (A Child) (Surrogacy: Time limit)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 3 October 2014
    ...is dated 12 January 2014. It dealt comprehensively with all the issues. Importantly, for present purposes, and having referred to Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam), [2010] 1 FLR 1156 (Hedley J), A v P (Surrogacy: Parental Order: Death of Applicant) [2011] EWHC 1738 (Fam), [20......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • A snapshot of surrogacy in Ireland with a comparative look at international practices
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 2-20, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...beyond ‘reasonable expenses’ in Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam), [2009] 1 FLR 733; Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam), [2010] 1 FLR 1156; Re L (Commercial Surrogacy) [2010] EWHC 3146 (Fam), [2011] 1 FLR 1423; Re IJ (Foreign Surrogacy Agreement Parental Order)......
  • Ex parte WH 2011 6 SA 514 (GNP) : recent case law
    • South Africa
    • De Jure No. 45-1, January 2012
    • 1 January 2012
    ...v P 2011 EWHC 1738 (Fam) par 33; Re IJ (Achild)(Foreign Surrogacy Agreement: Parental Order) 2011 2 FLR 646 par3; Re S (Parental Order) 2010 1 FLR 1156 par 2; Re X and Y (ForeignSurrogacy) 2009 2 WLR 1274 parr 2, 21); two, the fact that the paymentswere not so excessive as to have “overborn......
  • The new surrogacy parentage laws in Australia: cautious regulation or '25 brick walls'?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 1, April 2011
    • 1 April 2011
    ...parentage. For errors relating to the payment of 'reasonable expenses' and payment for 'lost earnings', see Re S (Parental Order) [2009] EWHC 2977 (Fam) (9 November 2009); Re C [2002] 1 FLR 909; C and C [1997] Fam Law 226. Re G (Surrogacy: Foreign Domicile) [2007] EWHC 2814 (Fam) (28 Novemb......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT