Re Saunders (G. L.) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1986
CourtChancery Division
[CHANCERY DIVISION] In re G.L. SAUNDERS LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) 1985 March 27, 28; May 24 Nourse J.

Company - Debenture - Receiver - Appointed by debenture holder - Debentures creating fixed and floating charges - Fixed charges paid off leaving surplus - Company in liquidation - Whether surplus to be paid to preferential creditors or to company - Companies Act 1948 (11 & 12 Geo. 6, c. 38), s. 94(1)F1

On 23 October 1972, the company granted an all moneys debenture to a bank, thereby creating a fixed charge upon the company's freehold and leasehold property, both present and future, and also upon the company's goodwill and uncalled capital, both present and future, together also with a floating charge upon “the undertaking and all other property and assets of the company both present and future.” It was provided that the charge thereby created should, at any time after the bank should have demanded payment of any money or liability thereby secured, entitle the bank to exercise the power of sale conferred on mortgagees by section 101 of the Law of Property Act 1925, without the restriction imposed by section 103 of that Act, and the power to appoint a receiver in the same terms. The company granted a further all moneys debenture to the bank, by a debenture dated 27 February 1981, charging six items of property, the first five of which were subject to a fixed charge, and the sixth of which was subject to a floating charge. The 1981 debenture gave similar powers to that of 1972. On 1 July 1982 the bank demanded payment of a sum in excess of £291500 and on 2 July 1982 appointed a receiver under the two debentures. Having apportioned receipts and payments between fixed and floating charges in the normal manner, the receiver paid £302075 out of the proceeds attributable to the fixed charges, leaving £3 only outstanding, and was left with a net surplus from the same source of £448494. Receivership charges, not likely to exceed £10000, would still be payable. The receiver was also left with some £194707 representing assets attributable to the floating charges, also liable to a due proportion of future receivership expenses. On 24 March 1983 an order was made for the company to be compulsorily wound up.

On the receiver's summons for directions under section 369(1) of the Companies Act 1948, as to whether the surplus moneys realised ought to be paid to the company's preferential creditors under section 94(1) of the Act or to the company, being the person entitled to the mortgaged property:—

Held, that on its true construction section 94 of the Companies Act 1948 did not defeat the right of the person entitled to the mortgaged property to be paid the surplus arising from the sale of assets subject to a fixed charge; and that, accordingly, the surplus proceeds from the fixed charges were payable to the liquidator in accordance with section 105 of the Law of Property Act 1925, and not to the preferential creditors (post, p. 219C–D).

In re Lewis Merthyr Consolidated Collieries Ltd. [1929] 1 Ch. 498, C.A. applied.

The following cases are referred to in the judgment:

Glyncorrwg Colliery Co. Ltd., In re [1926] Ch. 951

Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Goldblatt [1972] Ch. 498; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 953; [1972] 2 All E.R. 202, C.A.

Lewis Merthyr Consolidated Collieries Ltd., In re [1929] 1 Ch. 498, CA

Siebe Gorman & Co. Ltd. v. Barclays Bank Ltd. [1979] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 142

The following additional case was cited in argument:

South Eastern Railway Co. v. Jortin (1857) 6 H.L.Cas. 425, H.L.(E.)

SUMMONS

By a summons dated 18 July 1984, Roger Wallis Hatton, who had been appointed receiver and manager of G.L. Saunders Ltd. by Lloyds Bank Plc., under the powers contained in a debenture dated 27 February 1981, sought directions as to whether the surplus of proceeds of the realisation by him of assets of the company the subject of a fixed charge created by and contained in the debenture, remaining after the discharge of the company's indebtedness to Lloyds Bank Plc. and of his disbursements and remuneration should be applied by (i) discharging the liabilities of the company to its preferential creditors according to their respective entitlements pursuant to section 94 of the Companies Act 1948 and (ii) thereafter paying the surplus (if any) to the liquidator of the company or by paying the surplus to the liquidator. The respondent to the summons was Barry Ward, as liquidator, and the application was made under section 369 (1) of the Companies Act 1948 and R.S.C., Ord. 102, r.2(1). The preferential creditors were not made parties to the action, but agreed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • United Bars Ltd ((in Receivership)) v Revenue Commissioners
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 Enero 1991
    ...subject to a fixed charge. In Re Lewis Merthyr Consolidated Collieries Ltd [1929] 1 Ch 498 and In Re G L Saunders Ltd (in liquidation) [1986] 1 WLR 215 2. That monies received by a receiver upon realising assets subject to a fixed charge surplus to the sums due to the debenture holder were ......
  • Beggasa Ltd ((in Receivership))
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 3 Febrero 2023
    ...subject of a floating charge and not to assets subject to a fixed charge; this was followed in In re GL Saunders Ltd. (In Liquidation) [1986] 1 WLR 215, and Murphy J. – not without some reluctance – agreed to follow these decisions. In the course of his judgment he observed that the purpos......
  • Re Pearl Maintenance Services Ltd ; Re Pearl Building Contracts Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Companies Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Re H. Williams (Tallaght) Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 Octubre 1996
    ...V REVENUE COMMISSIONERS 1991 1 IR 396 MERTHYR CONSOLIDATED COLLIERIES, IN RE 1929 CH 498 GL SAUNDERS LTD (IN LIQUIDATION), IN RE 1986 1 WLR 215 COMPANIES ACT 1963 S285(14) OAKTHORPE HOLDINGS LTD, IN RE 1989 ILRM 62 COMPANIES ACT 1990 S134 Synopsis: COMPANY LAW Receivership - preferential ......
1 books & journal articles
  • The barbados companies act, cap. 308 and receivers' duties
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 6-1, June 1996
    • 1 Junio 1996
    ...the date of appointment of the receiver, 143 wages of any employees payable for time or piece work done during four months of the 140 [1986] 1 W.L.R. 215. See also Bank of New South Wales v. FCT (1979) 54 A.L.J.R. 129. 141 Reg. 30(l)(a). 142 Reg. 30(l)(b). 143 Reg. 30(2)(a). appointment of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT