Re Schebsman
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1943 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
50 cases
- Liow Su Fah; Yeng Hing Enterprise Sdn Bhd
- A Kanapathi Pillay v Joseph Chong
-
Brisbane City Council v Attorney General for Queensland
...v. Chester (1974) 48 A.L.J.R. 304. St. Mary Magdalen, Oxford v. Attorney-General (1857) 6 H.L.Cas. 189, H.L.(E.). Schebsman, In re [1944] Ch. 83; [1943] 2 All E.R. 768, C.A. Schellenberger v. Trustees Executors and Agency Co. Ltd. (1952) 86 C.L.R. 454. Smith, decd., In re [1967] V.R. 341. S......
-
Helena Gorbunova v The Estate of Boris Berezovsky (also known as Platon Elenin) (Deceased) and Others
...acquired the beneficial interest to the exclusion of himself: see Richards v Delbridge (1874) LR 18 Eq 11 at 14 (Sir George Jessel MR), Re Schebsman [1944] Ch 83 at 104 (du Parcq LJ), Paul v Constance [1977] 1 WLR 527 at 531 (Scarman LJ) and Tradegro (UK) Ltd v Wigmore Street Investments Lt......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Privity of Contract
...9 OWR 356 (HCJ); and Les Affréteurs Réunis Société Anonyme v Leopold Walford (London) Ltd , [1919] AC 801 (HL). 55 See Schebsman, In re , [1944] Ch 83 (CA); and Fournier Van & Storage Ltd v Fournier , [1973] 3 OR 741 (HCJ). 56 [1933] AC 70 (PC) [ Vandepitte ]. 57 Ibid at 80. 58 [1951] 2 KB ......
-
EQUITABLE REMEDIES: PROTECTING "WHAT WE HAVE COMING TO US".
...that benefit is asserted as a shield to defend against a claim brought by A or B, not an independent cause of action. (103) Re Schebsman, [1944] Ch. 83, in OOSTERHOFF FT AL., supra note 51. In Lloyd's v. Harper (1880) 16 Ch. 290 (Eng.), the court was willing to find that a contract between ......
-
The Problem with Intention: Is the Resulting Trust Approaching Extinction?
...money advanced seen as a loan. 9Chamber, R., Resulting Trusts (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1997), 34. Quotation from Parcq LJ in Re Schebsman [1944] Ch. 83. 10E.g. Australian case: Muschinski v Dodds [1985] 160C L.R 583. 11Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s.2(5): ‘nothing in......