Re Schebsman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1943 |
| Year | 1943 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
46 cases
- Liow Su Fah; Yeng Hing Enterprise Sdn Bhd
- A Kanapathi Pillay v Joseph Chong
- Re Miller's Agreement. Uniacke v Attorney General
-
Beswick v Beswick
...benefit of the third person. He cannot retain the money himself because it belongs to the third person and not to him, see Re Schebeman, 1944 Ch, 83. It is money had and received to the use of the third person. In Robertson v. wait, (1853) 8 Ex., p. 301, Baron Martin said: "If a person make......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Third Parties and Co-Parties
...51, notes that Corbin had been asked to write this article by Goodhart, editor of the Law Quarterly Review. 22 [1933] AC 70 (PC). 23 [1944] Ch 83 (CA) (Corbin’s article, see Corbin, ‘Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties’, was cited by the first instance judge, Uthwatt J, [1943] Ch 366......
-
Privity of Contract
...9 OWR 356 (HCJ); and Les Affréteurs Réunis Société Anonyme v Leopold Walford (London) Ltd , [1919] AC 801 (HL). 55 See Schebsman, In re , [1944] Ch 83 (CA); and Fournier Van & Storage Ltd v Fournier , [1973] 3 OR 741 (HCJ). 56 [1933] AC 70 (PC) [ Vandepitte ]. 57 Ibid at 80. 58 [1951] 2 KB ......
-
EQUITABLE REMEDIES: PROTECTING "WHAT WE HAVE COMING TO US".
...that benefit is asserted as a shield to defend against a claim brought by A or B, not an independent cause of action. (103) Re Schebsman, [1944] Ch. 83, in OOSTERHOFF FT AL., supra note 51. In Lloyd's v. Harper (1880) 16 Ch. 290 (Eng.), the court was willing to find that a contract between ......
-
Table of Cases
...[1913] 2 IR 64 (HL)�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������17.38 Schebsman, Re [1944] Ch 83 (CA)��������������������1.60, 9.30, 9.32, 9.37, 9.38, 9.40–9.42, 9.45, 27.02, 29.03 Schelde Delta Shipping BV v Astarte Shipping BV (‘The......
