Re Simpkin Marshall Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1958 |
| Year | 1958 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Lewisham and Guys Mental Health NHS Trust v Andrews (Deceased)
...other manner as may be described by Rules of Court. Reliance was placed on this definition from the judgment of Wynn-Parry J. in Re: Simpkin Marshall Ltd [1958] 3 All ER 611, and the terms of the Supreme Court Act 1981 s.151. (b) That a claim for compensation for discrimination was a right......
-
David Rees and Another v Gateley Wareing (A Firm)and Another
...that if no proceedings are ultimately begun, then the agreement in question can only be a non-contentious business agreement: see In re Simpkin Marshall Ltd [1959] Ch 229 at 233 and 235. Thus if solicitors are instructed, for example, to bring a claim for an alleged debt and they take advic......
-
Darya Belsner v Cam Legal Services Ltd
...costs would be payable to them in cases settling before stage 3). Finally, the Client argued that Wynn-Parry J had been wrong in In re Simpkin Marshall Ltd [1959] Ch 229 ( Simpkin Marshall) to hold that business was only to be regarded as contentious if proceedings had in fact been begun. ......
-
Rochem Group SA (Plaintiff) v Rochem Group SA (formerly Taulay SA) and Others (Defendants by Original Action)
...does not include a criminal proceeding by the Crown". Winding-up proceedings (I pause to comment) are not an action, as was decided in Re Simpkin Marshall (1959) Ch.229 at p. 233. They are, it is claimed, the creation of the Companies Act and the Companies Winding-up Rules. "Defendant" is d......
Request a trial to view additional results