Re Skupinski's Application

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2005
Date2005
CourtLands Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Winter and Another v Traditional & Contemporary Contracts Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 November 2007
    ...Bartlett QC: Re Fairclough Homes Ltd (LP/30/2001, unreported) (approved by this court in Shepherd v Turner [2006] 20 EG 294); and Re Skupinski's Application [2005] RVR 269. The latter was relevant to whether the tribunal should assess compensation by reference to the development value of th......
  • Decision Nº LP 3 2011. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 12-06-2012
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • 12 June 2012
    ...MBC v Alwiyah Developments [1983] 52 P&CR 378 Re Mansfield District Council’s Application [1976] 33 P&CR 141 Re Skupinski’s Application [2005] RVR 269 Winter v Traditional & Contemporary Contracts Limited [2008] 1 EGLR DECISION Introduction 1. The applicants, Mr John Coombes and Mrs Elizabe......
  • Decision Nº LP 10 2010. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 18-02-2011
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
    • 18 February 2011
    ...(Unreported) Wrotham Park Estate Co v Parkside Homes (1974) 1 WLR 798 Jaggard v Sawyer (1995) 1 WLR 269 Re Skupinsk’s Application [2005] RVR 269 Re Bass Limited’s Application (1973) 26 P & CR 156 The applicants, Paul and Gillian Marshall, are the freehold owners of 6a Nottingham Road, Botte......
1 books & journal articles
  • Release, Discharge or Modification of Restrictive Covenants
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part IV. Restrictive covenants (freehold land)
    • 30 August 2016
    ...allowed under the limited benefits’ ground, namely s 84(1A)(a)). In Winter , the tribunal (in accordance with Re Skupinski’s Application [2005] RVR 269) concluded that it should not assess compensation by reference to the development value of the application site. The tribunal found that an......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT