Re T (Wardship: Impact of Police Intelligence)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWHC 2440 (Fam) |
| Date | 2009 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Chief Constable v YK and Others
...in undertaking a further disclosure process. It was then envisaged, in light of the guidance provided by McFarlane J in Re T (Wardship: Impact of Police Intelligence) [2009] EWHC 2440, [2010] 1 FLR 1048 ( Re T) that a special advocate would remain involved to provide assistance through to ......
-
A County Council v SB, MA and AA
...for the approach adopted by McFarlane J (albeit in different circumstances) in paragraph 112(i) of his judgment in Re T (Wardship: Review of Police Protection Decision) (No 2) [2008] EWHC 196 (Fam) [2010] 1 FLR 1026, namely that full disclosure should be made to the court of the relevant ......
-
Re R (Closed Material Procedure: Special Advocates: Funding)
...to hold closed material hearings and invite the appointment of Special Advocates: see McFarlane J (as he then was) in Re T (Wardship: Impact of Police Intelligence) [2009] EWHC 2440 (Fam) ( Re T). This point was emphasised by Sir Nicholas Wall P, in describing the closed material procedures......
-
Q v Q
...criminal proceedings refuses representation." Nor is this a situation for the appointment of a special advocate: compare Re T (Wardship: Impact of Police Intelligence) [2009] EWHC 2440 (Fam), [2010] 1 FLR 1048, and BCC v FZ, AZ, HZ and TVP [2012] EWHC 1154 (Fam), [2013] 1 FLR 974. 68 What......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Essential Practice Guidance
...ordered by the trial judge or the President of the Family Division. 7 As to which see Re T (Wardship: Impact of Police Intelligence) [2009] EWHC 2440 (Fam), [2010] 1 FLR 1048, and A Chief Constable v YK [2010] EWHC 2438 (Fam), [2011] 1 FLR 1493. 8 Judges will wish to be alert to the need to......