Re Tasbian Ltd (No 3), Official Receiver v Nixon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
14 cases
-
Moorview Developments Ltd and Others v First Active Plc and Others
...Hare 100; Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2) [2002] 2 AC 773; Re Hydrodam (Corby) Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 180; Re Tasbian Ltd (No 3) [1993] BCLC 297; Re Pftzm Ltd [1995] BCC 280; Norberg v Wynrib [1992] 92 DLR (4th) 449; Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 AER 378; Phonographic Perf......
-
The Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Maria Helena Gifford and Others
...merits of the claim, then the court will not grant permission. So much is clear from the judgment of Balcombe LJ in In Re Tasbian (No 3) [1993] BCLC 297 at 301–2: "… what then is the test to be applied? In my judgment, it is the same test as that which is used on any application to the cour......
- Re Polly Peck International Plc (No 2); Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Ellis and Others
-
City of London Group Plc and Another v Lothbury Financial Services Ltd and Others
...course be a de facto director if the consultancy is a mere label which does not represent the true position (see for example Re Tasbian Limited (No 3) [1992] BCC 358) the present circumstances are very different from those in that case, where a company doctor monitored trading and controlle......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The Regulation of Shadow Directors
...(1999) Journal of Business Law 84, which describes them as a ‘backdoor approach’.11Leading cases include Re TasbianLtd (No 3) [1993] BCLC 297 (CA); Re Unisoft Group Ltd (No 3)[1994] 1 BCLC 609; Re Hydrodan (Corby) Ltd [1994] 2 BCLC 180 (ChD); Re PFTZM Ltd (inliquidation) [1995] 2 BCLC 354 (......