RE TC and JC (Children: Relocation)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam) |
| Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
DF v N B-F
... ... In the Matter of F (A Child) (International Relocation Cases) ... Between: DF Appellant and N B-F Respondent [2015] EWCA Civ 882 ... cross applications of the parties: that of L's mother for leave to remove her from the jurisdiction in accordance with section 13 (1) of the Children Act 1989 [CA 1989] and that of L's father for contact (now a child arrangements order) in accordance with section 8 CA 1989 ... 2 ... ...
-
Martha Josefina Ramirez Torres Applicant/Petitioner v Pedro Miguel Castellanos Basto Applicant/Respondent [ECSC]
...to the current state of the judicial authorities which has been summarized to the point of clarity in the 2013 English case of Re TC and JC (Children: Relocation)10 in which Mostyn J observed; "The foundation of the jurisprudence in this field is the well-known case of Poel v Poel [1970]......
-
Between: F Applicant v M Respondent
...matter before me where an unlawful retention took place in August 2020, I also note Mostyn J.'s cautionary warning given in Re TC and JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 292 (Fam) where, although he found that the mother's conduct was “abysmal” and “an act of cruelty” to the father and t......
-
NJ v OV
...and will be bitterly disappointed. There is no scope for finding some comfortable middle ground. 5 In my recent decision of Re TC & JC (Children: Relocation) [2013] EWHC 290 Fam., given on 21 st February 2013, I analysed the highly acute decision of the New Zealand Supreme Court in Kacim v ......
Request a trial to view additional results