Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); Re B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
-
R (B) v S (Responsible Medical Officer, Broadmoor Hospital)
...v K, D & L [2005] 1 FLR 851, the cases referred to therein and naturally in particular Re U (Serious Injury: standard of proof); Re B [2004] 2 FLR 263 and see also Re T (Abuse: Standard of Proof) [2004] 2 FLR 838,and Re G (a child) (non-accidental injury: standard of proof) [2001] 1 FCR 97)......
-
R v Lancashire County Council
...specifically expressed by the Court of Appeal in Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); Re B [2004] EWCA Civ 567 [2005] Fam 134, [2004] 2 FLR 263 at paras [22] and [23]: "(i) The cause of an injury or an episode that cannot be explained scientifically remains equivocal; (ii) Recurrence i......
-
ZZ, AZ, FA, ARA, KA and ASA (Children)
...to apply In re B (Minors) (Care Proceedings: Issue Estoppel) [1997] Fam 117, a decision of Hale J (as she then was) which I shall refer to as Re B, and Birmingham City Council v H and others [2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam), a decision of Charles I which I shall refer to as Birmingham (No 1). These t......
-
Lancashire County Council v R (1st Respondent) W (2nd Respondent) N (by her children's guardian Dawn Whittaker) (3rd Respondent)
...or that scientific research will throw light into corners that are at present dark: Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof): Re B [2004] 2 FLR 263 at para [24(v)]. Scientific certainties of a past age are often proved conclusively wrong by later generations: A County Council v M and F [201......
Request a trial to view additional results