Re v-B (Abduction: Custody Rights)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Gt v Kao
... ... /2007] T (G) v O (KA) IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILD ABDUCTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTODY ORDERS ACT 1991 AND IN MATTER OF THE HAGUE ... 249 I (H) v G (M) 2000 1 IR 110 2002 FAM LJ 11 O (CHILD ABDUCTION: CUSTODY RIGHTS), IN RE 1997 2 FLR 702 H (CHILD ABDUCTION: RIGHTS OF CUSTODY), IN RE 2000 1 FLR 201 H ... ...
-
Gt v Kao
...[1966] I.R. 567; (1966) 102 I.L.T.R. 1. Thomson v. Thomson [1994] 3 Can. S.C.R. 551. Re V-B (minors) (Abduction: custody rights) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 192; [1999] 2 FL.R. 371. In re R.W. (Minors) (Abduction: father's rights) [1998] 3 W.L.R. 1372; [1998] 2 F.L.R. 146. A.C.W. v. Ireland [1994] 3 I.......
-
Re H (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of custody)
...definition or quantification of contact cannot vest rights of custody in the court: see Re V-B (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1999] 2 FLR 192. ii. An application that in its substance seeks the court's determination on issues of physical care, parental responsibility (to use our current statu......
-
Hunter v Murrow
...court which uphold the boundary between Article 5(a) and 5(b) of the Convention are most recently Re: V – B (Abduction: Custody Rights) [1999] 2 FLR 192 and in Re: P (Abduction Consent) [2004] 2 FLR 1057. In both these cases the lead judgment was given by Ward LJ. In the first of these case......
Request a trial to view additional results