Re W (ex parte Orders)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
26 cases
- ND v KP (Asset freezing)
-
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Devine
...EXCHANGE CMSN v MANTERFIELD 2010 1 WLR 172 2009 2 AER 1009 2009 BUS LR 1593 W v H (FAMILY DIVISION: WITHOUT NOTICE ORDERS) 2001 1 AER 300 2000 2 FLR 927 2000 3 FCR 481 ALLEN & ORS v JAMBO HOLDINGS LTD & ORS 1980 1 WLR 1252 1980 2 AER 502 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1988 S89 (UK) DRUG TRAFFICKING A......
-
Ben Hashem v Al Shayif
...that the court should adopt a robust, questioning and, where appropriate, sceptical approach. As I said myself in Re W (Ex Parte Orders) [2000] 2 FLR 927, at 938: ‘the court will not allow itself to be bamboozled by husbands who put their property in the names of close relations in circumst......
-
X Council v B (emergency protection orders)
...authority is even heavier if the application is made ex parte. I need not repeat here what I have previously said on this topic in Re W (Ex Parte Orders) [2000] 2 FLR 927, in Kelly v BBC [2001] 1 FLR 197 and in Re S (Ex Parte Orders) [2001] 1 FLR 308. In the latter case at pp 314, 320, I su......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Is It An Offshore Sham? A Balanced Perspective Is Welcomed
...husband's arrangements appear to be artificial or even 'dodgy'." In referring to an earlier judgment of his in Re W (Ex Parte Orders) [2000] 2 FLR 927, Munby J also stated that he agreed the robust approach of Coleridge J where appropriate. But Munby J also went on to state, 'On the other h......
