Re W. (Minors) (Abduction: Father's Rights)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1998
Date1998
CourtFamily Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
28 cases
  • D., Re, (2007) 367 N.R. 330 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 16 November 2006
    ...81; 79 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [paras. 13, 34]. P., In re, [2004] EWCA Civ. 971; [2005] Fam. 293 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 14, 43]. W., In re, [1999] Fam. 1, refd to. [para. J., Petitioner, Re, [2005] CSIH 36; 2005 GWD 15-251 (Ct. Sess.), refd to. [paras. 14, 31]. Croll v. Croll (2000), 229 F.3d......
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 September 2007
    ... ... T (G) v O (KA) IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILD ABDUCTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTODY ORDERS ACT 1991 AND ... ) 2000 1 IR 110 2002 FAM LJ 11 O (CHILD ABDUCTION: CUSTODY RIGHTS), IN RE 1997 2 FLR 702 H (CHILD ABDUCTION: RIGHTS OF CUSTODY), IN ... this difficult concept of 'custody rights' relative to unmarried fathers for Convention purposes. It is not however necessary for this Court to ... contact could not vest rights of custody in the court (see Re V-B(minors)(abduction: rights of custody) [1999] 2 F.C.R. 371 ... 80 ... ...
  • Gt v Kao
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 November 2007
    ...Re V-B (minors) (Abduction: custody rights) [1999] 2 F.L.R. 192; [1999] 2 FL.R. 371. In re R.W. (Minors) (Abduction: father's rights) [1998] 3 W.L.R. 1372; [1998] 2 F.L.R. 146. A.C.W. v. Ireland [1994] 3 I.R. 232. X, Y and Z v. United Kingdom [1997] 2 F.L.R. 892. Family law - Child abductio......
  • Hampshire County Council v E
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 9 April 2020
    ...the mere issue of proceedings that have not yet been served will not normally be enough. That was the view expressed by Hale J. in In re W [1999] Fam 1, 19C and again in In re J [1999] 2 F.L.R. 653, 656B, having regard in each case to what had earlier been said in In re B (Abduction) (Right......
  • Get Started for Free