Re William C. Leitch Brothers Ltd (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1933 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Kelly, Re (A Bankrupt)
...was therefore not a debt which was provable in the bankruptcy by the applicant. In re William C. Leitch Brothers Limited (No. 2) [1933] 1 Ch. 261;Cotterell v. Price[1960] 1 W.L.R. 1097 followed. 2. That liberty to extend the time would be granted in respect of those sums which had been subm......
-
Richard Ciliang Yan v Mainzeal Property and Construction Ltd (in Liquidation)
...cases concerning the English provision from which s 268 of the 1933 Act and s 320 of the 1955 Act were drawn. In the first, Re William C Leitch Brothers Ltd (No 1), Maugham J concluded that the section envisaged that a judgment would issue for an identified sum of money. 64 That sum would u......
-
Re Cyona Distributors Ltd
...carried on the business of a Company fraudulently, the Court can make an order against him for the payment of a fixed sun, see Re William C. Leitch Bros. Ltd., 1932, 2 Chancery, p. 71. An order can be made eitherat the suit of the liquidator etc, or of a creditor. The sun may be compensato......
-
London & Sugar Overseas (sugar) Company Ltd and Another v Punjab National Bank
...liquidator, the court will usually order the sum to go into the general assets, as Eve J. did in In re William C. Leitch Bros. Ltd (No.2) [1933] Ch.261, but I do not think it is bound to do so. Certainly when an application is made by a creditor who has been defrauded, the court has power, ......
Request a trial to view additional results