Re Williams (Arthur) & Company ex parte Official Receiver

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1913
Date1913
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Jackson v Salisbury (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Official Assignee
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 Julio 2001
    ...to remind ourselves in which mode the Official Assignee was performing his duty. As Cozens-Hardy MR said in Re Arthur Williams & Co [1913] 2 KB 88: [W]here an official receiver ... is simply performing duties which are obligatory upon him in a judicial, or quasi-judicial, character, he is n......
  • R (Howard) v Official Receiver
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 Junio 2013
    ...– see Bottomley v. Brougham [1908] 1 KB 584, per Channell J at 587 – 598; In re John Tweddle and Co Ltd per Farwell LJ at 706 and In re Arthur Williams and Co per Cozens-Hardy MR at 93. He submitted that the OR would be exempt from the provisions of section 149 of the 2010 Act by virtue of ......
  • Gary John Fielding and Another v Stephen Hunt (acting as Liquidator of the Burnden Group Ltd)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 Marzo 2017
    ...a number of authorities which provide some assistance, and to which I shall refer. 12 The first case I was referred to is that of In re Arthur Williams & Co [1913] 2 KB 88, a decision of the Court of Appeal. The facts of that case were very different to the facts of the present case, since ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT