Re X and Y (Leave to Remove from Jurisdiction: No Order Principle)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
- Re H (Children) (Residence Order: Condition)
-
R (DJ) v Mental Health Review Tribunal; R (on the application of N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region)
... ... 37/41 Mental Health Act 1983 (a hospital order with a restriction order that was without limit ... as satisfied (a) that AN was suffering from a relevant form of disorder of a nature or degree ... This is the established general principle. There are exceptions such as contempt of court ... is a matter of state law which we leave to the Texas Supreme Court." ... or self-harm but also, if he is 'cured', remove or reduce the prospects of future compulsory ... ...
-
Birmingham City Council v S & Ors
...to an improvement from the point of view of the child’s welfare.” (Re X and Y (Leave to remove from the Jurisdiction: No order principle (2001) 2 FLR 118). Family Court Approved Judgment: Birmingham City Council v S & Ors 61. Thus, there must be “some tangible benefit to the children fr......