Re Yagerphone Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1935 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Power Knight Pte Ltd v Natural Fuel Pte Ltd
...(folld) Swiss Bank Corp v Lloyds Bank Ltd [1982] AC 584 (folld) Wight v Eckhardt Marine GmbH [2004] 1 AC 147 (refd) Yagerphone Ltd, Re [1935] Ch 392 (not folld) Companies Act (Cap 50,2006 Rev Ed) s 131 (1) (consd) ;ss 131,131 (3) (e) ,328 (1) ,328 (5) Land Titles Act (Cap 157,2004 Rev Ed) s......
-
Ward v Aitken and Others ; Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd
...a debenture (see Gough, Company Charges, 2nd ed. (1996), 122). 34 Such a distinction is supported by a number of authorities. First in Re Yagerphone Ltd. [1935] Ch. 392 Bennett J. held that a debenture charging all the present and future assets of a company did not cover money recovered by ......
- Hamilton and Fiorentino as Administrators of Kisoro Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd
- N A Kratzmann Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Tucker
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Harneys Corporate Recovery Services Guides to The Insolvency Act 2003 - Part 3
...Re Paramount Airways Ltd [1993] Ch 223 322 Section 435(1)(a) 323 UK Companies Act 1989 section 165 324 Section 251 325 Re Yagerphone Ltd [1935] Ch 392; Re Oasis Merchandising Services Ltd [1998] Ch 170 326 Re M C Bacon Ltd (No. 2) [1990 BCLC 607; Re Floor Fourteen Ltd. [2001] 3 All ER 499† ......
-
Harneys Corporate Recovery Services Guides to The Insolvency Act 2003 - Part 4
...330 Section 257† 331 See Re M C Bacon (No. 2) [1990] BCLC 607; Re Floor Fourteen, Lewis v IRC [2001] 2 BCLC†392† 332 Re Yagerphone Ltd [1935] Ch 392; Re M C Bacon (No. 2) [1990] BCLC 333 Section 254(1)† 334 Section 254(2)† 335 Section 254(3)† 336 Section 254(4)† 337 Re Etic Ltd [1928] Ch 86......
1 books & journal articles
-
Wrongful Trading: An Impotent Remedy?
...realising or getting in any of the assets of the company.' (33) See Willmott v London Celluloid Co. (1886) 34 Ch D 147; In Re Yagerphone [1935] Ch 392; and [1991] Ch 127, per Millett J at p. 138. (34) [1991] Ch 127, per Millett J at p. 138. (35) See ref. 34. (36) [1995] 2 BCLC 493. (37) See......