Re Young and Harston's Contract
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1884 |
| Date | 1884 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
- NTS Arumugam Pillai v Director-General of Inland Revenue
-
ICDL GCC Foundation FZ-LLC and Others v European Computer Driving Licence Foundation Ltd
...company relies on "wilful act," as an alternative basis for disapplying the cap on damages. 125 125. Re Young and Hartson [1886] L.R. 31 Ch D 168 was a case of a vendor and purchaser summons. The question was whether the purchaser had to pay interest for delay on payment of the purchase mon......
-
Essex County Council v UBB Waste (Essex) Ltd
...be used simply to mean that the act of default is intentional or deliberate. As Bowen LJ observed in Re Young & Harston's Contract (1885) 31 Ch. D. 168, at pages 174–5: “[Wilful] … is a word of familiar use in every branch of law, and although in some branches of the law it may have a speci......
-
ICDL GCC Foundation FZ-LLC and Others v European Computer Driving Licence Foundation Ltd
...Ardent) [1997] 2 Lloyd's Reports 547; Wheeler v. New Merton Board Mills Limited [1933] 2 KB 669 and Re Young and Hartson's Contract (1885) 31 Ch D 168 considered - Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11/7/ 2007, on the law applicable to non-contractu......
Request a trial to view additional results