Reader's Digest Association Ltd v Williams
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1976 |
| Year | 1976 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney General
...Whitbread v. Bell (1970) 2 Q.3. 547, with the approval of the House of Lords in Atkinson v. Morrell (1973) A.C. 239 culminating in Readers Digest v. Williams (1976) 1 V.L.R. 11C9. In that case the Headers Digest, in a sales campaign, issued nearly 5 million numbers among 20 million people. ......
-
Flynn v Denieffe
...& LOTTERIES ACT 1956 S2 GAMING & LOTTERIES ACT 1956 S21(1) GAMING & LOTTERIES ACT 1956 S21(2) READER'S DIGEST ASSOCIATION LTD V WILLIAMS 1976 1 WLR 1109 IMPERIAL TOBACCO & ANOR V AG 1981 AC 718 Synopsis: WORDS AND PHRASES "Lottery" Newspaper - Board game - Participants - Card holders - Ca......
-
Treasure Bay (St Lucia) Ltd Claimant v [1] The Gaming Authority [2] The Cabinet of Saint Lucia [3] The National Lotteries Authority [4] The Minister for Social Transformation Youth and Sports Respondents Cage St. Lucia Ltd Interested Party [ECSC]
... [1973] A.C. 289 ; Imperial Tobacco Ltd. v Attorney General [1981] A.C. 718; Whitbread & Co. Ltd. v Bell [1970] 2 Q.B. 547; Readers Digest Association Ltd. v Williams [1976] 1 WLR 1109; Morris v Blackman [1864] 2 H & C 912; Bartlett v Parker [1912] 2 K.B. 497;; McCollom v Wrightson 1968 WL ......
-
Treasure Bay (St. Lucia) Ltd v Gaming Authority et Al
...Ltd. v. Attorney General[1981] A.C. 718; Whitbread & Co. Ltd. v. Bell[1970] 2 Q.B. 547; Readers Digest Association Ltd. v. Williams[1976] 1 W.L.R. 1109; Morris v. Blackman[1864] 2 H & C 912; Bartlett v. Parker[1912] 2 K.B. 497;; McCollom v. Wrightson1968 W.L. 22933; Smith v. Wyles[1959] 1 Q......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Courts of Appeal
...and there is the possibility of thelossofthat price. The chance to win a prize free is not a lottery: seethe Readers Digest case [1976] 1 W.L.R. 1109. The importanceofthedecision in the present case is that it declares that there is no pres-umption that payment for a packet which contains a......