Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Australian Wheat Board (Houston City)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1956 |
| Date | 1956 |
| Year | 1956 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
- Vardinoyannis v Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (Evaggelos Th.)
-
Aegean Sea Traders Corporation v Repsol Petroleo SA ('The Aegean Sea') [QBD (Admiralty)]
...[1988] 1 Ll Rep 412 Prometheus, TheUNK [1974] 1 Ll Rep 350 Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Australian Wheat Board (“The Houston City”)ELR [1956] AC 266 Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & FoodELR [1962] 1 QB 42 Sagona, TheUNK [1984] 1 Ll Rep 194 Sheffield Corp v BarclayEL......
-
Gard Marine and Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Company Ltd and another
...from the judgment of Morris LJ in The Stork [1955] 2 QB 68, 105, which was a time charterparty case. See also Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Australian Wheat Board (The Houston City) [1956] AC 266, which was a voyage charterparty case to which essentially the same principles were applied. In Kodr......
- Transoceanic Petroleum Carriers v Cook Industries Inc. (Mary Lou)
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
...(117) Hadley (n 114) 43 (Winn LJ). (118) The Stork (n 114) 77, cited with approval in Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Australian Wheat Board [1956] AC 266, 282 (Lord Somervell for the Court), Simonius Vischer (n 70) 347 (Samuels JA) and Barclays Bank plc v Fairclough Building Ltd [1995] QB 214, 22......
-
Carriage of Goods by Charterparty
...its destination. 131 Usually within a limited range of ports. 132 Rcardon Smith Line v. Australian Wheat Board (The Houston City), [1956] A.C. 266 (EC.). 133 Or discharging. 134 E.g., GENCON, above note 123, cl.l. 386 MARITIME LAW from the charterer for breach of contract.135 The time at wh......
-
THE SAFE PORT PROMISE OF CHARTERERS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ENGLISH COMMON LAW
...good navigation and seamanship”. 77 The Mary Lou, supra n 5, at 279, per Mustill J; The Eastern City, supra n 38. 78 The Houston City [1956] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1(HL). 79 The Alhambra, supra n 49; Hall Bros Steamship Co Ltd v R & W Paul Ltd, supra n 50. 80 Knutsford (SS) Ltd v Tillmanns & Co [190......
-
NOMINATION OF PORTS BY THE VOYAGE CHARTERER
...port obligation applies in a like manner to voyage charterparties. SeeReardon Smith Line v. Australian Wheat Board (The Houston City)[1956] A.C. 266, at p. 282; Batis Maritime Corporation v. Petroleos del Mediterraneo S.A. (The Batis)[1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 345; see also Baker, “The Safe Port......